Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 23;400(10348):295-327.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00936-9.

Measuring contraceptive method mix, prevalence, and demand satisfied by age and marital status in 204 countries and territories, 1970-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

Affiliations

Measuring contraceptive method mix, prevalence, and demand satisfied by age and marital status in 204 countries and territories, 1970-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

Annie Haakenstad et al. Lancet. .

Abstract

Background: Meeting the contraceptive needs of women of reproductive age is beneficial for the health of women and children, and the economic and social empowerment of women. Higher rates of contraceptive coverage have been linked to the availability of a more diverse range of contraceptive methods. We present estimates of the contraceptive prevalence rate (CPR), modern contraceptive prevalence rate (mCPR), demand satisfied, and the method of contraception used for both partnered and unpartnered women for 5-year age groups in 204 countries and territories between 1970 and 2019.

Methods: We used 1162 population-based surveys capturing contraceptive use among women between 1970 and 2019, in which women of reproductive age (15-49 years) self-reported their, or their partner's, current use of contraception for family planning purposes. Spatiotemporal Gaussian process regression was used to generate estimates of the CPR, mCPR, demand satisfied, and method mix by age and marital status. We assessed how age-specific mCPR and demand satisfied changed with the Socio-demographic Index (SDI), a measure of social and economic development, using the meta-regression Bayesian, regularised, trimmed method from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study.

Findings: In 2019, 162·9 million (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 155·6-170·2) women had unmet need for contraception, of whom 29·3% (27·9-30·6) resided in sub-Saharan Africa and 27·2% (24·4-30·3) resided in south Asia. Women aged 15-19 years (64·8% [62·9-66·7]) and 20-24 years (71·9% [68·9-74·2]) had the lowest rates of demand satisfied, with 43·2 million (95% UI 39·3-48·0) women aged 15-24 years with unmet need in 2019. The mCPR and demand satisfied among women aged 15-19 years were substantially lower than among women aged 20-49 years at SDI values below 60 (on a 0-100 scale), but began to equalise as SDI increased above 60. Between 1970 and 2019, the global mCPR increased by 20·1 percentage points (95% UI 18·7-21·6). During this time, traditional methods declined as a proportion of all contraceptive methods, whereas the use of implants, injections, female sterilisation, and condoms increased. Method mix differs substantially depending on age and geography, with the share of female sterilisation increasing with age and comprising more than 50% of methods in use in south Asia. In 28 countries, one method was used by more than 50% of users in 2019.

Interpretation: The dominance of one contraceptive method in some locations raises the question of whether family planning policies should aim to expand method mix or invest in making existing methods more accessible. Lower rates of demand satisfied among women aged 15-24 years are also concerning because unintended pregnancies before age 25 years can forestall or eliminate education and employment opportunities that lead to social and economic empowerment. Policy makers should strive to tailor family planning programmes to the preferences of the groups with the most need, while maintaining the programmes used by existing users.

Funding: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests NF reports other funding support from WHO as a consultant from June to September 2019 and Gates Ventures since 2020, all outside the submitted work. NJH reports grants or contracts from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, outside the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Prevalence of modern contraceptive methods among women of reproductive age (15–49 years) and demand satisfied with modern contraceptive methods by location, 2019
Figure 2
Figure 2
Demand satisfied with modern contraceptive methods, by marital status, age group, and super-region, 1970–2019 *Age-standardised represents the aggregated estimates for ages 15–49 years using a standard age structure for all locations.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Total need for family planning and mix of contraceptive methods, by marital status (A), age group (B), and super-region (C), 1970–2019
Figure 4
Figure 4
Expected mCPR (A) and demand satisfied (B) by SDI for different age groups, 1970–2019 mCPR=modern contraceptive prevalence rate. SDI=Socio-demographic Index. *Age-standardised represents the aggregated estimates for ages 15–49 years using a standard age structure for all locations.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vos T, Lim SS, Abbafati C, et al. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396:1204–1222. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermudez A, Castaño F, Norton MH. Effects of birth spacing on maternal, perinatal, infant, and child health: a systematic review of causal mechanisms. Stud Fam Plann. 2012;43:93–114. - PubMed
    1. Field E, Pande R, Rigol N, Schaner S, Troyer Moore C. On her own account: how strengthening women's financial control impacts labor supply and gender norms. Am Econ Rev. 2021;111:2342–2375. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Francavilla F, Giannelli GC. Does family planning help the employment of women? The case of India. J Asian Econ. 2011;22:412–426.
    1. Finlay JE. Women's reproductive health and economic activity: a narrative review. World Dev. 2021;139

Substances