Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2022;17(4):1149-1158.
doi: 10.1007/s11625-022-01210-2. Epub 2022 Jul 19.

Alternatives to sustainable development: what can we learn from the pluriverse in practice?

Affiliations
Editorial

Alternatives to sustainable development: what can we learn from the pluriverse in practice?

Shivani Kaul et al. Sustain Sci. 2022.

Abstract

The debates on the sustainability of development have a long history. Although the Brundtland Report popularized "sustainable development", this slippery concept sidelined previous critiques of development and has been compatible with a wide range of conflicting agendas. A notable example of this contradiction is the uncritical promotion of capitalist growth in the pursuit of social justice and ecosystem health by the sustainable development goals. In contrast to this reliance on the "one world" of Euroamerican market economies, this special feature presents 12 case studies of "alternatives to sustainable development". These case studies question the anthropocentric universalism of the development project and enact radically different relational ontologies, often gathered under the conceptual umbrella of the "pluriverse". They focus on territorial, community, and network initiatives that intend to move methodologically beyond discourse analysis with a situated and empirical analysis of how pluriversal practices might flourish as well as generate tensions. We identify three frictions with capitalist modernity emerging from these contributions: (1) how alternatives to sustainable development relate to state institutions, (2) how they engage with the distribution of surplus, and (3) how they unsettle scientific epistemologies, at times regenerating past resources-and at other times radical futures. With this special feature, we hope to re-politicize the debates on the science and practice of sustainability, and weave the contributions of anticolonial and indigenous science studies into neo-Marxist and post-development critiques.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ake C. Democracy and development in Africa. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press; 2001.
    1. Amin S. Delinking: towards a polycentric world. London: Zed Books; 1990.
    1. Arsel M, Dasgupta A. Critique, rediscovery and revival in development studies. Dev Change. 2015;46(4):644–665. doi: 10.1111/dech.12183. - DOI
    1. Asara V, Otero I, Demaria F, Corbera E. Socially sustainable degrowth as a social-ecological transformation. Repoliticizing sustainability. Sustain Sci. 2015;10(3):375–384. doi: 10.1007/s11625-015-0321-9. - DOI
    1. Büscher B, Feola G, Fischer A, Fletcher R, Gerber J-F, Harcourt W, Koster M, Schneider M, Scholtens J, Spierenburg M, Walstra V, Wiskerke H. Planning for a world after-COVID-19: a call for post-neoliberal development. World Dev. 2021;140:105357. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105357. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources