Design and Development of a Scale for Evaluating the Acceptance of Social Robotics for Older People: The Robot Era Inventory
- PMID: 35874107
- PMCID: PMC9302437
- DOI: 10.3389/fnbot.2022.883106
Design and Development of a Scale for Evaluating the Acceptance of Social Robotics for Older People: The Robot Era Inventory
Abstract
Introduction: Nowadays, several robots have been developed to provide not only companionship to older adults, but also to cooperate with them during health and lifestyle activities. Despite the undeniable wealth of socially assistive robots (SARs), there is an increasing need to customize the tools used for measuring their acceptance in real-life applications.
Methods: Within the Robot-Era project, a scale was developed to understand the degree of acceptance of the robotic platform. A preliminary test with 21 participants was performed to assess the statistical validity of the Robot-Era Inventory (REI) scales.
Results: Based on the criteria observed in the literature, 41 items were developed and grouped in different scales (perceived robot personality, human-robot interaction, perceived benefit, ease of use, and perceived usefulness). The reliability of the Robot-Era Inventory scale was analyzed with Cronbach's alpha, with a mean value of 0.79 (range = 0.61-0.91). Furthermore, the preliminary validity of this scale has been tested by using the correlation analysis with a gold standard, the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model.
Discussion: The Robot-Era Inventory represents a useful tool that can be easily personalized and included in the assessment of any SARs that cooperate with older people in real environment applications.
Keywords: embodiment; older people; scale validity; social assistive robotics; social presence; technology acceptance; usability.
Copyright © 2022 Bevilacqua, Di Rosa, Riccardi, Pelliccioni, Lattanzio, Felici, Margaritini, Amabili and Maranesi.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Development of a metric to evaluate the ergonomic principles of assistive systems, based on the DIN 92419.Ergonomics. 2023 Jun;66(6):821-848. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2022.2127920. Epub 2022 Sep 30. Ergonomics. 2023. PMID: 36137226
-
Robotic Services Acceptance in Smart Environments With Older Adults: User Satisfaction and Acceptability Study.J Med Internet Res. 2018 Sep 21;20(9):e264. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9460. J Med Internet Res. 2018. PMID: 30249588 Free PMC article.
-
Identifying Features that Enhance Older Adults' Acceptance of Robots: A Mixed Methods Study.Gerontology. 2019;65(4):441-450. doi: 10.1159/000494881. Epub 2019 Mar 7. Gerontology. 2019. PMID: 30844813
-
Acceptance of an assistive robot in older adults: a mixed-method study of human-robot interaction over a 1-month period in the Living Lab setting.Clin Interv Aging. 2014 May 8;9:801-11. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S56435. eCollection 2014. Clin Interv Aging. 2014. PMID: 24855349 Free PMC article.
-
A Meta-Analysis on Remote HRI and In-Person HRI: What Is a Socially Assistive Robot to Do?Sensors (Basel). 2022 Sep 21;22(19):7155. doi: 10.3390/s22197155. Sensors (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36236261 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Instruments for Measuring Psychological Dimensions in Human-Robot Interaction: Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties.J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jun 5;26:e55597. doi: 10.2196/55597. J Med Internet Res. 2024. PMID: 38682783 Free PMC article.
-
Framing the Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence Concepts and Methods: Scoping Review.JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 May 28;12:e67350. doi: 10.2196/67350. JMIR Hum Factors. 2025. PMID: 40435517 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Al-Youssef I. Y. (2015). Student. Acceptance. and. Use. of. Internet-Based. Distance. Education. in. Saudi. Electronic. University. (SEU):. A. Mixed. Method. Study (Doctoral dissertation, Ohio University). OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. Available online atg: http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ohiou1424175265
-
- Bartneck C., Forlizzi J. (2004). A design-centred framework for social human-robot interaction. Proc.. Ro-Man. 591–594. 10.1109/ROMAN.2004.1374827 - DOI
-
- Bartneck C., Kulić D., Croft E. (2009). Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots. Int.. J.. Soc.. Robot. 1, 71–81. 10.1007/s12369-008-0001-3 - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous