Institutional development and the government response to COVID-19 in China
- PMID: 35874974
- PMCID: PMC9293789
- DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2022.102629
Institutional development and the government response to COVID-19 in China
Abstract
As COVID-19 is pervasive across the globe, governments in different countries face the dilemma of restricting the transmission risk of the virus by social distancing while yet maintaining economic activity. Inadequate social distancing policies lead to more infection cases and deaths, while over stringent social distancing policies have significant economic cost implications. This study investigates the role of local government institutions in striking the balance between saving lives and economic recovery. We based our study on a sample of 28 provincial governments in China during the early outbreak of 2020 when the emergency responses of local governments were synchronous. The findings show that local governments in those provinces with lower degrees of marketization, which were accustomed to directly intervene in the social system, mandatorily quarantined many more close contacts for each confirmed case than those in the more market-oriented provinces whose social distancing policies took economic considerations into account. The 'overdone' (over stringent) social distancing policies in the more state-oriented provinces led to lower human mobility and economic growth. This study highlights the importance of taking economic considerations into account when adopting policies and strategies to combat the spread of COVID-19 and how different institution management cultures lead to different outcomes.
Keywords: Close contacts; Institutional development; Marketization; Overdone social distancing; Population migration; Quarantine.
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Figures







Similar articles
-
Impact of self-imposed prevention measures and short-term government-imposed social distancing on mitigating and delaying a COVID-19 epidemic: A modelling study.PLoS Med. 2020 Jul 21;17(7):e1003166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003166. eCollection 2020 Jul. PLoS Med. 2020. PMID: 32692736 Free PMC article.
-
Economic impact of government interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic: International evidence from financial markets.J Behav Exp Finance. 2020 Sep;27:100371. doi: 10.1016/j.jbef.2020.100371. Epub 2020 Jun 29. J Behav Exp Finance. 2020. PMID: 32835011 Free PMC article.
-
Untying the Precise Impact of COVID-19 Policy on Social Distancing Behavior.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 21;18(3):896. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18030896. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33494178 Free PMC article.
-
Social distancing policies in 22 African countries during the COVID-19 pandemic: a desk review.Pan Afr Med J. 2020 Dec 14;37(Suppl 1):46. doi: 10.11604/pamj.supp.2020.37.46.27026. eCollection 2020. Pan Afr Med J. 2020. PMID: 33552374 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak Quarantine, Isolation, and Lockdown Policies on Mental Health and Suicide.Front Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 16;12:565190. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.565190. eCollection 2021. Front Psychiatry. 2021. PMID: 33935817 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Striving for wellbeing digitally in the city amidst the pandemic: Solidarity through Twitter in Ankara.Habitat Int. 2023 Jul;137:102846. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102846. Epub 2023 May 25. Habitat Int. 2023. PMID: 37251700 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of dual climatic and socioeconomic factors on global trends in infectious disease outbreaks.Sci Rep. 2025 May 8;15(1):16092. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83431-2. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40341221 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of the Return to Work Program for Disabled Workers during the Pandemic COVID-19 Using the Quality of Life and Work Ability Index: Cross-Sectional Study.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 10;20(4):3094. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043094. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36833789 Free PMC article.
-
COVID-19 and Regional Income Inequality in China.Front Public Health. 2021 May 11;9:687152. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.687152. eCollection 2021. Front Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34046393 Free PMC article.
-
How does Covid-19 affect global equity markets?Financ Innov. 2022;8(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40854-021-00330-5. Epub 2022 Mar 1. Financ Innov. 2022. PMID: 35251895 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Adolph C., Amano K., Bang-Jensen B., Fullman N., Wilkerson J. Pandemic politics: Timing state-level social distancing responses to COVID-19. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law. 2021;46(2):211–233. - PubMed
-
- Barrios J.M., Hochberg Y. National Bureau of Economic Research; 2020. Risk perception through the lens of politics in the time of the covid-19 pandemic (No. w27008)
-
- Barrot J.N., Grassi B., Sauvagnat J. 2020. Sectoral effects of social distancing (April 2, 2020). HEC Paris research paper No. FIN-2020-1371.https://ssrn.com/abstract=3569446 Available at SSRN:
-
- Béland L.P., Brodeur A., Wright T. 2020. The short-term economic consequences of covid-19: Exposure to disease, remote work and government response.https://ssrn.com/abstract=3608531 IZA Discussion Paper No. 13282, Available at SSRN: - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials