Survival Outcomes of Patients With Stage IB3 Cervical Cancer Who Undergo Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy Versus Radiochemotherapy
- PMID: 35875125
- PMCID: PMC9296848
- DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.933755
Survival Outcomes of Patients With Stage IB3 Cervical Cancer Who Undergo Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy Versus Radiochemotherapy
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to compare the survival outcomes among stage IB3 cervical cancer patients who undergo abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH)+pelvic lymphadenectomy ± para-aortic lymph node dissection versus radiochemotherapy (R-CT).
Methods: Based on the large number of diagnoses and treatments for cervical cancer in the Chinese database, propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare the 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates of the ARH group and R-CT group.
Results: There were 590 patients with stage IB3 cervical cancer according to the FIGO 2018 staging system, with 470 patients in the ARH group and 120 patients in the R-CT group. The ARH and R-CT groups showed different 5-year OS and DFS rates in the total study population, and the 5-year OS and DFS rates in the R-CT group (n = 120) were lower than those in the ARH group (n = 470) (OS: 78.1% vs. 92.1%, p < 0.001; DFS: 71.6% vs. 90.3%, p < 0.001). R-CT was associated with a worse 5-year OS rate (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.401; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.875-6.167; p < 0.001) and DFS rate (HR = 3.440; 95% CI = 2.075-5.703; p < 0.001) by Cox multivariate analysis. After 1:3 PSM, the 5-year OS and DFS rates in the R-CT group (n = 108) were lower than those in the RH group (n = 280) (OS: 76.4% vs. 94.0%, p < 0.001; DFS: 69.3% vs. 92.6%, p < 0.001, respectively). R-CT was associated with a worse 5-year OS rate (HR = 4.071; 95% CI = 2.042-8.117; p < 0.001) and DFS rate (HR = 4.450; 95% CI = 2.441-8.113; p < 0.001) by Cox multivariate analysis.
Conclusion: Our study found that for FIGO 2018 stage IB3 cervical cancer patients, ARH resulted in better OS and DFS than R-CT.
Keywords: abdominal radical hysterectomy; cervical cancer; disease-free survival; overall survival; radiochemotherapy; stage IB3 cervical cancer.
Copyright © 2022 Li, Yang, Guo, Liang, Duan, Wang, Hao, Liang, Li, Zhan, Xie, Lang, Liu and Chen.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Comparison of survival outcomes of abdominal radical hysterectomy and radiochemotherapy IIA2 (FIGO2018) cervical cancer: a retrospective study from a large database of 63,926 cases of cervical cancer in China.Int J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar;27(3):619-625. doi: 10.1007/s10147-021-02090-9. Epub 2021 Nov 27. Int J Clin Oncol. 2022. PMID: 34837596
-
Discussion on the Treatment Strategy for Stage ⅡA1 Cervical Cancer (FIGO 2018).Front Oncol. 2022 Apr 14;12:800049. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.800049. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35494051 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of oncological outcomes between radical hysterectomy and radiochemotherapy for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2018 stage IIIC1 cervical adenocarcinoma: A retrospective multicenter cohort study.J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2025 May;51(5):e16307. doi: 10.1111/jog.16307. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2025. PMID: 40355122
-
Comparison of Minimally Invasive Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis.Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 24;11:762921. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.762921. eCollection 2021. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35141141 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Survival Outcomes after Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Patients with Cervical Cancer.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 May;28(5):971-981.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.12.012. Epub 2020 Dec 14. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 33321255 Review.
Cited by
-
Development and validation of the competing risk nomogram and risk classification system for predicting cancer-specific mortality in patients with cervical adenosquamous carcinoma treated via radical hysterectomy.Biomol Biomed. 2025 Apr 3;25(5):1099-1110. doi: 10.17305/bb.2024.11217. Biomol Biomed. 2025. PMID: 39508785 Free PMC article.
-
Nerve-Sparing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy (nsLRH) without Adjuvant Therapy in FIGO Stage IB3 Cervical Cancer Patients: Surgical Technique and Survival Outcomes.Cancers (Basel). 2024 Sep 30;16(19):3355. doi: 10.3390/cancers16193355. Cancers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39409974 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes between Radical Hysterectomy and Primary Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Women with Bulky IB and IIA Cervical Cancer under Risk Stratification.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jun 2;15(11):3034. doi: 10.3390/cancers15113034. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37296994 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Liu P, Lin L, Kong Y, Huo Z, Zhu L, Bin X, et al. Comparison of Survival Outcomes Between Radio-Chemotherapy and Radical Hysterectomy With Postoperative Standard Therapy in Patients With Stage IB1 to IIA2 Cervical Cancer: Long-Term Oncological Outcome Analysis in 37 Chinese Hospitals. BMC Cancer (2020) 20:1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-6651-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous