Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep;36(9):e14775.
doi: 10.1111/ctr.14775. Epub 2022 Aug 10.

Open to robotic right donor hepatectomy: A tectonic shift in surgical technique

Affiliations

Open to robotic right donor hepatectomy: A tectonic shift in surgical technique

Binoj Sivasankara Pillai Thankamony Amma et al. Clin Transplant. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Robotic right live donor hepatectomy (r-LDRH) has been reported with reduced morbidity compared to open donor right hepatectomy (o-LDRH) in few recent series. Nevertheless, its routine use is debated. We present a large series comparing pure r-LDRH with o-LDRH. Consecutive r-LDRH performed from June 2018 to June 2020 (n = 102) were compared with consecutive donors undergoing o-LDRH (n = 152) from February 2016 to February 2018, a period when r-LDRH was not available at this center. Propensity score matched (PSM) analysis of 89 case-control pairs was additionally performed. Primary endpoints were length of high dependency unit (HDU) and hospital stay and Clavien-Dindo graded complications among donors. Although r-LDRH took longer to perform (540 vs. 462 min, P < .001), the postoperative peak transaminases levels (P < .001), the length of HDU (3 vs. 4 days, P < .001), and hospital stay (8 vs. 9 days, P < .001) were lower in in donors undergoing r-LDRH. Clavien-Dindo graded complications were similar (16.67% in r-LDRH and 13.16% in o-LDRH). The rates of early allograft dysfunction (1.6% vs. 3.3%), bile leak (14.7% vs. 10.7%), and 1-year mortality (13.7% vs. 11.8%) were comparable between r-LDRH and o-LDRH recipients. PSM analysis yielded similar results between the groups. These data support the safety and feasibility of r-LDRH in select donors.

Keywords: donor hepatectomy; liver transplantation: living donor; minimally invasive surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Kelley Jr WE. The evolution of laparoscopy and the revolution in surgery in the decade of the 1990 s. JSLS. 2008;12(4):351.
    1. Dagher I, Gayet B, Tzanis D, et al. International experience for laparoscopic major liver resection. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Sci. 2014;21(10):732-736.
    1. Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA. World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients. Ann Surg. 2009;250(5):831-841.
    1. Ciria R, Cherqui D, Geller DA, et al. Comparative short-term benefits of laparoscopic liver resection: 9000 cases and climbing. Ann Surg. 2016;63(4):761-777.
    1. Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, et al. The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg. 2009;250(5):25-830.

LinkOut - more resources