Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb;32(1):31-42.
doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1618. Epub 2022 Jul 25.

Danish heritable retinoblastoma survivors' perspectives on reproductive choices: "It's important for me, not to pass on this condition"

Affiliations

Danish heritable retinoblastoma survivors' perspectives on reproductive choices: "It's important for me, not to pass on this condition"

Pernille A Gregersen et al. J Genet Couns. 2023 Feb.

Abstract

Despite reporting an overall normal life, survivors of heritable retinoblastoma face numerous physical and psychosocial issues. In particular, reproductive decision-making is often complex and difficult. This study aims to examine survivors' reflections on passing on heritable retinoblastoma to their children, how survivors approach their reproductive choices, and how the healthcare system can optimize counseling and support. Semi-structured interviews with Danish adult survivors of heritable retinoblastoma were qualitatively analyzed to explore their experiences. Participants were recruited from the Retinoblastoma Survivorship Clinic, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. Thematic data analysis was conducted followed by a condensing process specifically for the subthemes relating to reproductive choices. A common subtheme for all participants was a strong wish to avoid passing on retinoblastoma to their children. The participants emphasized the various medical, practical, emotional, and moral issues impacting their final reproductive choice in the process of family planning to conceive a child unaffected by retinoblastoma. Some had no option other than to conceive naturally and hope for an unaffected baby; while others weighed the pros and cons of choosing natural conception with prenatal testing and then considering termination of pregnancy (in case of an affected fetus) versus choosing fertility treatment with preimplantation genetic testing to achieve an unaffected pregnancy. Several participants underlined the complexity of their decisions, and also expressed feelings of guilt, both toward their affected child, and guilt for putting their partner through many difficult decisions and obstacles due to their genetic condition. Our findings demonstrate how one family-planning decision is not unequivocally "better" or easier than another. Healthcare professionals must provide the necessary information and tools to support the individual's unique decision-making process. Survivors' autonomy and individual needs, as well as the numerous and diverse aspects of heritable retinoblastoma, should be carefully considered.

Keywords: complex disease: retinoblastoma; decision-making: reproductive choices; genetic counseling; preimplantation genetic testing (PGT); prenatal diagnosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Four major themes following thematic analysis

Similar articles

References

    1. Beard, C. A. , Amor, D. J. , Di Pietro, L. , & Archibald, A. D. (2016). "I'm Healthy, It's Not Going To Be Me": Exploring experiences of carriers identified through a population reproductive genetic carrier screening panel in Australia. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 170(8), 2052–2059. 10.1002/ajmg.a.37697 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boardman, F. K. (2014a). The expressivist objection to prenatal testing: The experiences of families living with genetic disease. Social Science & Medicine, 107, 18–25. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.02.025 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boardman, F. K. (2014b). Knowledge is power? The role of experiential knowledge in genetically ‘risky’ reproductive decisions. Sociology of Health & Illness, 36(1), 137–150. 10.1111/1467-9566.12048 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boardman, F. K. , & Hale, R. (2018). How do genetically disabled adults view selective reproduction? Impairment, identity, and genetic screening. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine, 6(6), 941–956. 10.1002/mgg3.463 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Braun, V. , & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Publication types