Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct;40(10):971-977.
doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01175-1. Epub 2022 Jul 25.

Collaborating with Patient Partners to Model Clinical Care Pathways in Major Depressive Disorder: The Benefits of Mixing Evidence and Lived Experience

Affiliations

Collaborating with Patient Partners to Model Clinical Care Pathways in Major Depressive Disorder: The Benefits of Mixing Evidence and Lived Experience

Mary Bunka et al. Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Partnering with patients can enrich the design and development of models of clinical care pathways, yet the practice is not commonplace. Guidelines or "best practices" for patient involvement in modeling are scarce.

Objectives: In this paper, we outline the steps we took to form an effective partnership with patients to design a robust microsimulation Markov model of major depressive disorder care pathways in British Columbia, Canada, with the aim of encouraging other teams to partner with patients in healthcare modeling endeavors.

Methods: We describe three unique phases of our collaborative process: uncertainty, mapping, and structured collaboration. We then explore the unique contributions the patient partners made, not only to the model itself, but to our process. Key perspectives are shared from both the modeler and the patient partners in their own words.

Results: The patient partners made distinct contributions by challenging and verifying modeling assumptions, noting limitations of the model, and suggesting areas for future research. Both the patient partners and the modelers saw great value in the partnership and agreed that the model was strengthened by the diversity of the team.

Conclusions: We present our learning and key recommendations for future modeling teams in the absence of tested frameworks. We encourage more widespread adoption of patient involvement in modeling and the development of guidelines for such work to increase the democracy of scientific decision making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Mary Bunka, Shahzad Ghanbarian, Linda Riches, Ginny Landry, Louisa Edwards, Alison M. Hoens, and Stirling Bryan have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article.

References

    1. Manafo E, Petermann L, Mason-Lai P, et al. Patient engagement in Canada: a scoping review of the ‘how’ and ‘what’ of patient engagement in health research. Health Res Policy Syst. 2018;16(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0282-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Strategy for patient-oriented research—patient engagement framework. https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/48413.html#a4. Accessed 6 Jan 2022.
    1. Staniszewska S, Hill EM, Grant R, et al. Developing a framework for public involvement in mathematical and economic modelling: bringing new dynamism to vaccination policy recommendations. Patient. 2021;14(4):435–445. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00476-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hawton A, Boddy K, Kandiyali R, et al. Involving patients in health economics research: “the PACTS principles”. Patient. 2021;14(4):429–434. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00461-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Squires H, Chilcott J, Akehurst R, et al. A framework for developing the structure of public health economic models. Value Health. 2016;19(5):588–601. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.02.011. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources