Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jul 5;10(7):128.
doi: 10.3390/dj10070128.

Tooth Agenesis Patterns in Orofacial Clefting Using Tooth Agenesis Code: A Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Review

Tooth Agenesis Patterns in Orofacial Clefting Using Tooth Agenesis Code: A Meta-Analysis

Brian J Howe et al. Dent J (Basel). .

Abstract

Individuals with orofacial clefting (OFC) have a higher prevalence of tooth agenesis (TA) overall. Neither the precise etiology of TA, nor whether TA occurs in patterns that differ by gender or cleft type is yet known. This meta-analysis aims to identify the spectrum of tooth agenesis patterns in subjects with non-syndromic OFC and controls using the Tooth Agenesis Code (TAC) program. An indexed search of databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL) along with cross-referencing and hand searches were completed from May to June 2019 and re-run in February 2022. Additionally, unpublished TAC data from 914 individuals with OFC and 932 controls were included. TAC pattern frequencies per study were analyzed using a random effects meta-analysis model. A thorough review of 45 records retrieved resulted in 4 articles meeting eligibility criteria, comprising 2182 subjects with OFC and 3171 controls. No TA (0.0.0.0) was seen in 51% of OFC cases and 97% of controls. TAC patterns 0.2.0.0, 2.0.0.0, and 2.2.0.0 indicating uni- or bi-lateral missing upper laterals, and 16.0.0.0 indicating missing upper right second premolar, were more common in subjects with OFC. Subjects with OFC have unique TA patterns and defining these patterns will help increase our understanding of the complex etiology underlying TA.

Keywords: cleft lip and palate; hypodontia; machine learning; phenotype.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Prisma flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plots of most common TAC patterns, all subjects [14,15,16,18].

Similar articles

References

    1. Letra A., Menezes R., Granjeiro J., Vieira A. Defining Subphenotypes for Oral Clefts Based on Dental Development. J. Dent. Res. 2007;86:986–991. doi: 10.1177/154405910708601013. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Walker S.C., Mattick C.R., Hobson R.S., Steen I.N. Abnormal tooth size and morphology in subjects with cleft lip and/or palate in the north of England. Eur. J. Orthod. 2009;31:68–75. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn073. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rawashdeh M.A., Abu Sirdaneh E.O. Crown morphologic abnormalities in the permanent dentition of patients with cleft lip and palate. J. Craniofacial Surg. 2009;20:465. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31819b97bf. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wu T.-T., Chen P.K.T., Lo L.-J., Cheng M.-C., Ko E.W.-C. The characteristics and distribution of dental anomalies in patients with cleft. Chang Gung Med. J. 2011;34:306. - PubMed
    1. Howe B., Cooper M.E., Vieira A.R., Weinberg S., Resick J.M., Nidey N., Wehby G.L., Marazita M.L., Uribe L.M. Spectrum of Dental Phenotypes in Nonsyndromic Orofacial Clefting. J. Dent. Res. 2015;94:905–912. doi: 10.1177/0022034515588281. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources