Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 1;150(4):771-780.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009535. Epub 2022 Jul 26.

Minimally Invasive Approach to Skin Tightening of the Face and Body: Systematic Review of Monopolar and Bipolar Radiofrequency Devices

Affiliations

Minimally Invasive Approach to Skin Tightening of the Face and Body: Systematic Review of Monopolar and Bipolar Radiofrequency Devices

Rod J Rohrich et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Radiofrequency treatment is a relatively new and increasingly popular option for patients desiring skin tightening and an improvement in facial or body contour without undergoing an excisional surgical procedure. A systematic review of the literature was performed to investigate the safety and efficacy of monopolar and bipolar radiofrequency devices for facial and body rejuvenation.

Methods: A computerized search of the MEDLINE database was performed for clinical studies investigating the use of monopolar and bipolar radiofrequency devices in facial and body rejuvenation. Data on the type of device, treated areas, number of patients, number of treatments, follow-up, complications, and outcomes were collected.

Results: The systematic review was performed in September of 2020. A total of 207 articles examined the use of radiofrequency technology for cosmetic purposes, and 23 articles remained after all inclusion and exclusion criteria were considered. Nine articles evaluated monopolar devices and five articles evaluated bipolar devices for treatment of the face. Three articles evaluated monopolar devices and six articles evaluated bipolar devices for treatment of various body areas.

Conclusion: There is clinical evidence that monopolar and bipolar radiofrequency devices produce measurable improvement in skin laxity of the face and body with an acceptable complication profile. The majority of reported complications are minor and transient in nature; major complication rates are higher with the use of monopolar devices than with the use of bipolar devices.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hantash BM, Renton B, Berkowitz RL, Stridde BC, Newman J. Pilot clinical study of a novel minimally invasive bipolar microneedle radiofrequency device. Lasers Surg Med. 2009;41:87–95.
    1. Orringer JS, Voorhees JJ, Hamilton T, et al. Dermal matrix remodeling after nonablative laser therapy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;53:775–782.
    1. Alam M, Dover JS. Nonablative laser and light therapy: An approach to patient and device selection. Skin Therapy Lett. 2003;8:4–7.
    1. Greene RM, Green JB. Skin tightening technologies. Facial Plast Surg. 2014;30:62–67.
    1. Arnoczky SP, Aksan A. Thermal modification of connective tissues: Basic science considerations and clinical implications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000;8:305–313.

Publication types