Masked Speech Recognition as a Function of Masker Location for Cochlear Implant Users With Single-Sided Deafness
- PMID: 35877957
- DOI: 10.1044/2022_AJA-21-00268
Masked Speech Recognition as a Function of Masker Location for Cochlear Implant Users With Single-Sided Deafness
Abstract
Purpose: Cochlear implant (CI) recipients with normal or near normal hearing (NH) in the contralateral ear, referred to as single-sided deafness (SSD), experience significantly better speech recognition in noise with their CI than without it, although reported outcomes vary. One possible explanation for differences in outcomes across studies could be differences in the spatial configurations used to assess performance. This study compared speech recognition for different spatial configurations of the target and masker, with test materials used clinically.
Method: Sixteen CI users with SSD completed tasks of masked speech recognition presented in five spatial configurations. The target speech was presented from the front speaker (0° azimuth). The masker was located either 90° or 45° toward the CI-ear or NH-ear or colocated with the target. Materials were the AzBio sentences in a 10-talker masker and the Bamford-Kowal-Bench Speech-in-Noise test (BKB-SIN; four-talker masker). Spatial release from masking (SRM) was computed as the benefit associated with spatial separation relative to the colocated condition.
Results: Performance was significantly better when the masker was separated toward the CI-ear as compared to colocated. No benefit was observed for spatial separations toward the NH-ear. The magnitude of SRM for spatial separations toward the CI-ear was similar for 45° and 90° when tested with the AzBio sentences, but a larger benefit was observed for 90° as compared to 45° for the BKB-SIN.
Conclusions: Masked speech recognition in CI users with SSD varies as a function of the spatial configuration of the target and masker. Results supported an expansion of the clinical test battery at the study site to assess binaural hearing abilities for CI candidates and recipients with SSD. The revised test battery presents the target from the front speaker and the masker colocated with the target, 90° toward the CI-ear, or 90° toward the NH-ear.
Similar articles
-
The Relationship Between Spatial Release From Masking and Listening Effort Among Cochlear Implant Users With Single-Sided Deafness.Ear Hear. 2025 May-Jun 01;46(3):624-639. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001611. Epub 2025 Feb 19. Ear Hear. 2025. PMID: 39966994
-
Speech Recognition With Informational and Energetic Maskers in Patients With Single-Sided Deafness After Cochlear Implantation.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Aug 9;64(8):3343-3356. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00677. Epub 2021 Jul 26. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021. PMID: 34310192
-
The Roles of Selective Attention and Asymmetric Experience in Bilateral Speech Interference for Single-Sided Deafness Cochlear Implant and Vocoder Listeners.Ear Hear. 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001687. Online ahead of print. Ear Hear. 2025. PMID: 40533892
-
Cochlear Implantation in Children With Single-Sided Deafness: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Jan 1;147(1):58-69. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.3852. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021. PMID: 33151295 Free PMC article.
-
Recognizing Voices Through a Cochlear Implant: A Systematic Review of Voice Perception, Talker Discrimination, and Talker Identification.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Aug 17;65(8):3165-3194. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-21-00209. Epub 2022 Aug 4. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022. PMID: 35926089 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical