Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Jul 25;23(1):708.
doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05663-5.

Short incision versus minimally invasive surgery with tool-kit for carpal tunnel syndrome release: a prospective randomized control trial to evaluate the anterior wrist pain and time to return to work or activities

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Short incision versus minimally invasive surgery with tool-kit for carpal tunnel syndrome release: a prospective randomized control trial to evaluate the anterior wrist pain and time to return to work or activities

Pichitchai Atthakomol et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Trial design: The prospective randomized controlled trial.

Background: This study compares outcomes in terms of early postoperative anterior wrist pain and time to return to work or activities of daily living of patients who underwent carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) release with short incision and those who had minimally invasive surgery (MIS) with CTS kits.

Methods: A total of 24 patients diagnosed with primary CTS confirmed with electrodiagnosis at an academic university hospital were randomly assigned into one of two groups of 12 patients each: a short incision group and an MIS with tool-kit group using computer-generated block randomization (block of four). Sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes were used in the allocation concealment process. In the short incision group, skin was incised longitudinally from Kaplan's line to the area distal to transverse wrist crease (2.5-4.0 cm) while in the tool-kit group, an incision of less than 2.5 cm. was made using special MIS-CTS kits. Primary outcomes evaluated include visual analogue scale (VAS) measurement of pain intensity in the anterior carpal area both while at rest and while conducting daily activities at the 2nd week postoperatively as well as the time to return to activities of daily living and work. Improvement in the Michigan hand questionnaire (MHQ) score, a secondary outcome, was also measured at the 2nd week postoperatively. Patients, allocator and outcome assessor were blinded.

Results: Demographic data, including preoperative electrodiagnostic severity and occupation, were similar in the two groups. There were no significant differences in terms of VAS of the early postoperative anterior carpal area at rest (p > 0.99), while conducting daily activities (p = 0.89) and time to return to activities of daily living (p = 0.46) and work (p = 0.24). The MHQ score improvement at the 2nd week postoperatively showed no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.95). The MIS wound length in the tool-kit group was significantly shorter than in the short incision group (1.95 vs 2.92 cm, p < 0.01).

Conclusions: There is no difference in early postoperative anterior wrist pain, time to return to work or to activities of daily living between the surgical techniques. Short incision is recommended for benefit in term of cost-effectiveness, while MIS with tool-kit could be preferred in patients who concerned in cosmetic appearance between the surgical techniques.

Trial registration: www.

Clinicaltrials: in.th (TCTR20200530003). Registered 30 May 2020.

Keywords: Anterior wrist pain; Carpal tunnel syndrome; Minimally invasive surgery; Randomized controlled trial; Short incision; Time to return to activities of daily living; Time to return to work.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Tool-kits (MIS-CTS kits) for minimally invasive surgery were supported by SCG Chemicals Co Ltd.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Short incision showing complete transverse carpal ligament release under direct observation
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
MIS with tool-kit technique showing complete transverse carpal ligament release under direct observation
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
CONSORT flow diagram

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dawson DM. Entrapment neuropathies of the upper extremities. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(27):2013–2018. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199312303292707. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Katz JN, Keller RB, Fossel AH, Punnett L, Bessette L, Simmons BP, et al. Predictors of return to work following carpal tunnel release. Am J Ind Med. 1997;31(1):85–91. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199701)31:1<85::AID-AJIM13>3.0.CO;2-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Papanicolaou GD, McCabe SJ, Firrell J. The prevalence and characteristics of nerve compression symptoms in the general population. J Hand Surg Am. 2001;26(3):460–466. doi: 10.1053/jhsu.2001.24972. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, Ornstein E, Ranstam J, Rosen I. Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. JAMA. 1999;282(2):153–158. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.2.153. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Werner RA. Evaluation of work-related carpal tunnel syndrome. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16(2):207–222. doi: 10.1007/s10926-006-9026-3. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types