Adapting user-centered design principles to improve communication of peer parent narratives on pediatric tracheostomy
- PMID: 35879768
- PMCID: PMC9316812
- DOI: 10.1186/s12911-022-01911-9
Adapting user-centered design principles to improve communication of peer parent narratives on pediatric tracheostomy
Abstract
Background: Parents who have to make tracheostomy decisions for their critically ill child may face forecasting errors and wish to learn from peer parents. We sought to develop an intervention with peer parent narratives to help parents anticipate and prepare for future challenges before making a decision.
Methods: To ensure that the intervention reflects parents' needs (rather than experts' opinions), we adapted a user-centered design (UCD) process to identify decision-critical information and refine the presentation format by interviewing parents who had tracheostomy decision making experience. Phase 1 (n = 10) presented 15 possible forecasting errors and asked participants to prioritize and justify the problematic ones. It also asked participants to comment on the draft narratives and preferred delivery mode and time of the intervention. Phase 2 (n = 9 additional parents and 1 previous parent) iteratively collected feedback over four waves of user interviews to guide revisions to the informational booklet.
Results: Phase 1 revealed that parents wanted information to address all forecasting errors as soon as tracheostomy becomes an option. They also highlighted diverse family situations and the importance of offering management strategies. The resulting prototype booklet contained five sections: introduction, child's quality of life, home care, practical challenges, and resources. Feedback from Phase 2 focused on emphasizing individualized situations, personal choice, seriousness of the decision, and caregiver health as well as presenting concrete illustrations of future challenges with acknowledgement of positive outcomes and advice. We also learned that parents preferred to use the booklet with support from the care team rather than read it alone.
Conclusions: A UCD process enabled inclusion of parental perspectives that were initially overlooked and tailoring of the intervention to meet parental expectations. Similar UCD-based approaches may be valuable in the design of other types of patient communications (e.g., decision aids).
Keywords: Decision making; Narratives; Patient education as topic; Pediatric tracheostomy; User-centered design.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Using Narratives to Correct Forecasting Errors in Pediatric Tracheostomy Decision Making.Med Decis Making. 2021 Apr;41(3):305-316. doi: 10.1177/0272989X21990693. Epub 2021 Feb 9. Med Decis Making. 2021. PMID: 33559518 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The parent perspective: "being a good parent" when making critical decisions in the PICU.Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014 May;15(4):291-8. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000076. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014. PMID: 24583502 Free PMC article.
-
Development of a Decision Aid for Family Surrogate Decision Makers of Critically Ill Patients Requiring Renal Replacement Therapy in ICU: A User-Centered Design for Rapid Prototyping.Chin Med Sci J. 2024 Jun 30;39(2):91-101. doi: 10.24920/004326. Chin Med Sci J. 2024. PMID: 38769053
-
Parental Decision-Making in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: An Integrative Review.J Fam Nurs. 2021 May;27(2):154-167. doi: 10.1177/1074840720975869. Epub 2021 Feb 1. J Fam Nurs. 2021. PMID: 33523765 Review.
-
Parents' experiences and views of caring for a child with a tracheostomy: a literature review.Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Oct;77(10):1630-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.07.020. Epub 2013 Aug 1. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013. PMID: 23953483 Review.
Cited by
-
Development and acceptability testing of a tracheostomy decision support video for parents.PEC Innov. 2025 Jun 24;7:100412. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100412. eCollection 2025 Dec. PEC Innov. 2025. PMID: 40686552 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D. Heuristics and biases: the psychology of intuitive judgment. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources