Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Sep 1;34(5):473-489.
doi: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000863. Epub 2022 Jul 25.

Is less more in the surgical treatment of early-stage cervical cancer?

Mirte Schaafsma  1   2   3 , Marie Plante  4 , Constantijne H Mom  5   6 , Nienke E van Trommel  1   6
Affiliations
Review

Is less more in the surgical treatment of early-stage cervical cancer?

Mirte Schaafsma et al. Curr Opin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: This article discusses recent developments towards less radical surgical treatment for early-stage cervical cancer.

Recent findings: Surgery is the standard treatment for early-stage cervical cancer. In the last decades, new treatment strategies have been developed aiming to reduce morbidity, without hampering oncological safety. We provide an update of the latest knowledge on safety and morbidity following less radical surgical procedures in early-stage cervical cancer. In cervical cancer with a tumour size of 2 cm or less, radical surgery (simple hysterectomy or fertility-sparing conisation) may be a well tolerated option. For patients with larger lesions (>2 cm) and wishing to preserve fertility, administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by less extensive surgery appears to be a feasible and well tolerated alternative to abdominal trachelectomy. With regard to lymph node assessment, increasing evidence shows the feasibility of the sentinel lymph node procedure instead of full pelvic lymphadenectomy. Prospective trials reporting on oncological safety are awaited.It is important to exercise caution when new surgical strategies are introduced. Despite promising retrospective data, prospective randomized studies may present unexpected results, for instance, minimally invasive radical hysterectomy showed inferior results compared to laparotomy.

Summary: There is a shift towards less radical treatment for early-stage cervical cancer. This review explores whether and when less is really more.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Arbyn M, Weiderpass E, Bruni L, et al. Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis. Lancet Global Health 2020; 8:e191–e203.
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68:7–30.
    1. Cibula D, Potter R, Planchamp F, et al. The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Society of Pathology Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Cervical Cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2018; 28:641–655.
    1. Derks M, van der Velden J, Frijstein MM, et al. Long-term pelvic floor function and quality of life after radical surgery for cervical cancer: a multicenter comparison between different techniques for radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2016; 26:1538–1543.
    1. Hazewinkel MH, Sprangers MA, van der Velden J, et al. Long-term cervical cancer survivors suffer from pelvic floor symptoms: a cross-sectional matched cohort study. Gynecol Oncol 2010; 117:281–286.

Publication types