Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Aug;36(8):545-556.
doi: 10.1177/15459683221110894. Epub 2022 Jul 26.

Effect of Robot-Assisted Training on Unilateral Spatial Neglect After Stroke: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effect of Robot-Assisted Training on Unilateral Spatial Neglect After Stroke: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Rodrigo Bazan et al. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Several studies have shown that robotic devices can effectively improve motor function in stroke patients through limb activation. However, the effects of robot-assisted therapy on perceptual deficits after stroke is unclear.

Objective: This review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of robotic limb activation in patients with unilateral spatial neglect (USN) after stroke.

Methods: In this systematic review, a literature search was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and LILACS databases without language restrictions. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs of robot-assisted therapy for USN after stroke were selected. Two reviewers independently assessed the risk of bias and certainty of the evidence of the included studies.

Results: A total of 630 studies were identified, including five studies for qualitative synthesis and four meta-analyses. The results of RCTs comparing robotic limb activation with a control group suggested an improvement in the degree of USN measured by the line bisection test (standardized mean difference [SMD], -0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.13 to -0.15; P = .01). There were no differences between the groups in the motor-free visual perception test 3rd edition (SMD, 0.27; 95% CI, -0.25-0.79; P = .31), star cancellation test (SMD, 0.26; 95% CI, -0.42-0.94; P = .54), Albert's test (SMD, -0.67; 95% CI, -2.01-0.66; P = .32), and Catherine Bergego Scale (SMD, -0.81; 95% CI, -2.07-0.45; P = .21).

Conclusion: The study demonstrated that limb activation through robotic therapy can improve midline perception. However, there was no impact on tasks assessing visual scanning, functionality, or activities of daily living.

Keywords: limb activation; robot-assisted therapy; stroke; unilateral spatial neglect.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources