Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 31;10(4):e0176122.
doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01761-22. Epub 2022 Jul 26.

Evaluation of the Aptima HBV Quant Assay Compared to Abbott RealTime M2000 HBV Quant Assay and Procleix Ultrio Plus dHBV Assay in Plasma Samples

Affiliations

Evaluation of the Aptima HBV Quant Assay Compared to Abbott RealTime M2000 HBV Quant Assay and Procleix Ultrio Plus dHBV Assay in Plasma Samples

Ying Yan et al. Microbiol Spectr. .

Abstract

Analytical performance of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA quantitative assay is critical for screening infection and initiating and monitoring antiviral treatment. In this study, the limit of detection (LoD) and linearity of Aptima HBV Quant assay were evaluated, and analytical performance was compared with that of the Abbott RealTime M2000 HBV Quant assay and the Procleix Ultrio Plus dHBV assay in plasma samples. The LoDs for genotypes B, C, and D plasma samples were 2.139 (1.531, 4.520), 3.120 (2.140, 7.373), and 3.330 (2.589, 4.907) IU/mL, respectively. The R2 value fitted by linear regression of serially diluted samples less than 2,000 IU/mL was above 0.9. There was no difference in positive rate between Aptima and Abbott or between Aptima and Procleix. Quantitative results of Aptima and Abbott showed good correlation with an r of >0.9 using Spearman analysis, while the quantitative results of Aptima were slightly lower than those of Abbott. Usual mutations in the HBV S region had no impact on Aptima assay. This study showed that Aptima is a dual-targeted transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) assay suitable for HBV DNA detection in clinical practice, with quantitative performance comparable to that of the Abbott RealTime M2000 HBV Quant assay and qualitative performance comparable to that of the Procleix Ultrio Plus dHBV assay. IMPORTANCE The Aptima HBV Quant assay (Hologic Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) is a dual-target real-time transcription-mediated amplification (RT-TMA) assay. This study aims to evaluate whether this assay is suitable for HBV DNA detection. As a result, the assay showed high sensitivity with LoDs below 3.5 IU/mL. The amplification efficiency of Aptima for samples below 2,000 IU/mL is adequate for clinical practice, with an R2 of >0.9 fitted by linear regression. Usual mutations in the HBV S region did not affect the performance of Aptima. Moreover, its performance was comparable to the widely used Abbott RealTime M2000 HBV Quant assay for detecting HBV DNA in plasma specimens. Although not indicated for use as a diagnostic or blood screening assay, the Aptima HBV Quant assay demonstrated comparable qualitative performance to the Procleix Ultrio Plus dHBV system.

Keywords: Abbott RealTime M2000 HBV Quant assay; Aptima HBV Quant assay; HBV DNA; Procleix Ultrio Plus dHBV assay; dual-target; limit of detection; mutation; real-time TMA.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Linearity of Aptima quantitation of genotype B (A), C (B), and D (C) plasma samples.
FIG 2
FIG 2
Flow chart of comparing Aptima HBV Quant assay with Abbott RealTime M2000 assay and Procleix Ultrio Plus dHBV assay using plasma samples.
FIG 3
FIG 3
Comparison of quantitative results between Aptima and Abbott assays. Spearman analysis was used to estimate the correlation of all of the samples (A), those below 2,000 IU/mL (B), and those above 2,000 IU/mL (C). Differences were analyzed by Bland-Altman plot (D to F).
FIG 4
FIG 4
Comparison of quantitative results of mutation panel between Aptima and Abbott assays. Spearman analysis was used for estimation of the correlation of all of the samples (A), genotype B samples (B), and genotype C samples (C). Differences were analyzed by Bland-Altman plot (D to F).
FIG 5
FIG 5
Relative light unit of Procleix Ultrio Plus dHBV assay between three groups divided by the results of Aptima HBV Quant assay.

Similar articles

References

    1. World Health Organization. 2017. Global hepatitis report. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
    1. World Health Organization. 2018. Hepatitis B. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hepatitis-b.
    1. Terrault NA, Lok ASF, McMahon BJ, Chang KM, Hwang JP, Jonas MM, Brown RS, Jr, Bzowej NH, Wong JB. 2018. Update on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic hepatitis B: AASLD 2018 hepatitis B guidance. Hepatology 67:1560–1599. doi:10.1002/hep.29800. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chinese Society of Infectious Diseases, Chinese Society of Hepatology. 2019. The guidelines of prevention and treatment for chronic hepatitis B (2019 version). Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi 27:938–961. (In Chinese.) - PubMed
    1. European Association for the Study of the Liver. 2017. EASL 2017 clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatitis B virus infection. J Hepatol 67:370–398. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2017.03.021. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms