Development and Internal Validation of the ARISE Prediction Models for Rebleeding After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
- PMID: 35881023
- DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002045
Development and Internal Validation of the ARISE Prediction Models for Rebleeding After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Abstract
Background: Aneurysmal rerupture is one of the most important determents for outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and still occurs frequently because individual risk assessment is challenging given the heterogeneity in patient characteristics and aneurysm morphology.
Objective: To develop and internally validate a practical prediction model to estimate the risk of aneurysmal rerupture before aneurysm closure.
Methods: We designed a multinational cohort study of 2 prospective hospital registries and 3 retrospective observational studies to predict the risk of computed tomography confirmed rebleeding within 24 and 72 hours after ictus. We assessed predictors with Cox proportional hazard regression analysis.
Results: Rerupture occurred in 269 of 2075 patients. The cumulative incidence equaled 7% and 11% at 24 and 72 hours, respectively. Our base model included hypertension, World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies scale, Fisher grade, aneurysm size, and cerebrospinal fluid drainage before aneurysm closure and showed good discrimination with an optimism corrected c-statistic of 0.77. When we extend the base model with aneurysm irregularity, the optimism-corrected c-statistic increased to 0.79.
Conclusion: Our prediction models reliably estimate the risk of aneurysm rerupture after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage using predictor variables available upon hospital admission. An online prognostic calculator is accessible at https://www.evidencio.com/models/show/2626 .
Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2022. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Letter: Development and Internal Validation of the ARISE Prediction Models for Rebleeding After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.Neurosurgery. 2022 Dec 1;91(6):e176. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002189. Epub 2022 Oct 18. Neurosurgery. 2022. PMID: 36255183 No abstract available.
-
In Reply: Development and Internal Validation of the ARISE Prediction Models for Rebleeding After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.Neurosurgery. 2023 Jan 1;92(1):e12. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002208. Epub 2022 Nov 1. Neurosurgery. 2023. PMID: 36519868 No abstract available.
References
-
- Ohkuma H, Tsurutani H, Suzuki S. Incidence and significance of early aneurysmal rebleeding before neurosurgical or neurological management. Stroke. 2001;32(5):1176-1180.
-
- van Donkelaar CE, Bakker NA, Veeger NJ, et al. Predictive factors for rebleeding after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: rebleeding aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage study. Stroke. 2015;46(8):2100-2106.
-
- Boogaarts HD, van Lieshout JH, van Amerongen MJ, et al. Aneurysm diameter as a risk factor for pretreatment rebleeding: a meta-analysis. J Neurosurg. 2015;122(4):921-928.
-
- van Lieshout JH, Pumplun I, Fischer I, et al. Volume of cerebrospinal fluid drainage as a predictor for pretreatment aneurysmal rebleeding. J Neurosurg. 2018;128(6):1778-1784.
-
- Tang C, Zhang TS, Zhou LF. Risk factors for rebleeding of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e99536.
References
-
- Ohman J, Heiskanen O. Timing of operation for ruptured supratentorial aneurysms: a prospective randomized study. J Neurosurg. 1989;70(1):55-60.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
