Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 22;9(7):936.
doi: 10.3390/children9070936.

Personal and Social Resources Are Linked to Cognition and Health-Related Quality of Life in Childhood Cancer Survivors

Affiliations

Personal and Social Resources Are Linked to Cognition and Health-Related Quality of Life in Childhood Cancer Survivors

Valerie Siegwart et al. Children (Basel). .

Abstract

Personal and social resources may buffer the adverse effects of childhood cancer and its impact on cognition and quality of life. While childhood cancer survivors show domain-specific cognitive difficulties, little is known about their personal and social resources. We therefore investigated personal and social resources and their association with cognitive and quality-of-life outcomes in childhood cancer survivors. Seventy-eight survivors of childhood cancer of different etiologies (aged 7−16 years; ≥one year since treatment) and fifty-six healthy controls were included. Cognitive outcome was assessed by neuropsychological tests; personal and social resources, as well as health-related quality of life, were assessed by standardized questionnaires. In the social resource domain, peer integration was worse in survivors than in controls (puncorr < 0.04, d = 0.33). Personal resources and all other subscales of social resources did not significantly differ between survivors and controls. In survivors, the global resource score was significantly correlated with processing speed (r = 0.39, pcorr < 0.001) and quality of life (parent: r = 0.44; self-report: r = 0.46; pscorr < 0.001). In controls, no association occurred between resources and cognitive outcome, and the correlation between the global resource score and quality of life did not withstand correction for multiple comparison (parent: r = 0.28; self-report: r = 0.40, psuncorr < 0.001). After an adverse event such as childhood cancer, resources might play a particularly buffering role on cognitive performance and quality of life (when compared to the everyday life of healthy controls). This highlights the importance of interventions that strengthen the resources of children and their families, even years after cancer. Such resource-focused intervention could help to counteract long-term sequelae in cognitive outcomes and health-related quality of life.

Keywords: childhood cancer survivors; cognitive outcome; health-related quality of life; social and personal resources.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Correlational matrices between subscales of personal and social resources and cognition as well as quality of life in (a) controls and (b) childhood cancer survivors. Note. Two-sided Pearson correlation; color intensity indicates the strength of the correlation coefficient, red colors imply positive correlations, blue colors imply negative correlations; QoL = quality of life. No p-values withstand Bonferroni correction.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Warner E.E., Smith R.S. Vulnerable but Invincible: A Study of Resilient Children. McGraw-Hill; New York, NY, USA: 1982.
    1. Windle G. What is resilience? A review and concept analysis. Rev. Clin. Gerontol. 2011;21:152–169. doi: 10.1017/S0959259810000420. - DOI
    1. Masten A.S., Hubbard J.J., Gest S.D., Tellegen A., Garmezy N., Ramirez M. Competence in the context of adversity: Pathways to resilience and maladaptation from childhood to late adolescence. Dev. Psychopathol. 1999;11:143–169. doi: 10.1017/S0954579499001996. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schultze-Lutter F., Schimmelmann B.G., Schmidt S.J. Resilience, risk, mental health and well-being: Associations and conceptual differences. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry. 2016;25:459–466. doi: 10.1007/s00787-016-0851-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Friborg O., Hjemdal O., Rosenvinge J.H., Martinussen M. A new rating scale for adult resilience: What are the central protective resources behind healthy adjustment? Int. J. Methods Psychiatr. Res. 2003;12:65–76. doi: 10.1002/mpr.143. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources