Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 15;9(7):1060.
doi: 10.3390/children9071060.

Impact of Quality Improvement Bundle on Neonatal Mortality in a District Hospital in Tanzania

Andrea Pietravalle  1 , Luca Brasili  2 , Francesco Cavallin  3 , Margherita Piquè  2 , Chiara Zavattero  2 , Gaetano Azzimonti  2 , Donald Micah Maziku  4 , Dionis Erasto Leluko  4 , Giovanni Putoto  1 , Daniele Trevisanuto  5
Affiliations

Impact of Quality Improvement Bundle on Neonatal Mortality in a District Hospital in Tanzania

Andrea Pietravalle et al. Children (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: The poor quality of care received by mothers and neonates in many limited-resource countries represents a main determinant of newborn mortality. Small and sick hospitalized newborns are the highest-risk population, and they should be one of the prime beneficiaries of quality-of-care interventions. This study aimed to evaluate the impact on neonatal mortality of quality improvement interventions which were implemented at Tosamaganga Council Designated Hospital, Iringa, Tanzania, between 2016 and 2020.

Methods: A retrospective comparison between pre- and post-intervention periods was performed using the chi-square test and Fisher's exact test. Effect sizes were reported as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

Results: The analysis included 5742 neonates admitted to the Special Care Unit (2952 in the pre-intervention period and 2790 in the post-intervention period). A decrease in mortality among infants with birth weight between 1500 and 2499 g (overall: odds ratio 0.49, 95% confidence interval 0.27-0.87; inborn: odds ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.27-0.93) was found. The analysis of cause-specific mortality showed a decrease in mortality for asphyxia (odds ratio 0.33, 95% confidence interval 0.12-0.87) among inborn infants with birth weight between 1500 and 2499 g.

Conclusions: A quality improvement intervention was associated with decreased mortality among infants with birth weight between 1500 and 2499 g. Further efforts are needed to improve prognosis in very-low-birth-weight infants.

Keywords: B.A.B.I.E.S. Matrix tool; low birth weight infants; neonatal mortality; quality improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
World Health Organization B.A.B.I.E.S. Matrix tool, modified from Joy Lawn et al. [10].
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Victoria G.C., Requejo J.H., Barros A.J.D., Berman P., Bhutta Z., Boerma T., Chopra M., de Francisco A., Daelmans B., Hazel E., et al. Countdown to 2015 for maternal newborn and child survival. A decade tracking progress maternal, newborn, child survival. Lancet. 2016;387:2049–2059. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00519-X. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lawn J.E., Cousens S., Zupan J., Lancet Neonatal Survival Steering Team 4 million neonatal deaths: When? Where? Why? Lancet. 2005;365:891–900. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71048-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liu L., Oza S., Hogan D., Perin J., Rudan I., Lawn J.E., Cousens S., Mathers C., Black R.E. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality in 2000–2013, with projections to inform post-2015 priorities: An updated systematic analysis. Lancet. 2015;385:430–440. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61698-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van den Broek N.R., Graham W.J. Quality of care for maternal and newborn health: The neglected agenda. BJOG. 2009;116:18–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02333.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ovretveit J., Appleby J. Does improving quality of care save money? BMJ. 2009;339:b3678. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3678. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources