Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jul 12;11(14):2063.
doi: 10.3390/foods11142063.

Benefits and Risks Associated with Meat Consumption during Key Life Processes and in Relation to the Risk of Chronic Diseases

Affiliations
Review

Benefits and Risks Associated with Meat Consumption during Key Life Processes and in Relation to the Risk of Chronic Diseases

Carlotta Giromini et al. Foods. .

Abstract

Red meat has been an important part of the diet throughout human evolution. Overall, when included as part of a healthy and varied diet, red meat can provide a rich source of bioavailable essential nutrients and high biological value protein. The present paper discusses the dietary role/impact of red and processed meat, with some reference to the relative effect of white meat, in a range of chronic conditions including iron-deficiency anaemia, cardiovascular diseases (CVD), cancer and dementia. The role of red meat in relation to key physiological conditions such as maintaining skeletal muscle and bone health and during pregnancy is also discussed. The inclusion of lean red meat in a healthy, varied diet may be beneficial during these critical conditions. There is however increasing evidence that red meat and especially processed meat are associated with increased risks of CVD, cancer and dementia whereas white meat is neutral or associated with a lower risk. There now seems little doubt that processed and unprocessed meat should have separate public dietary guidance.

Keywords: anaemia; bone health; chronic diseases; dementia; pregnancy; processed meat; red meat.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Global meat production (a) and meat production by livestock type (b). Source: https://ourworldindata.org/meat-production (accessed on 1 February 2022) [1].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Changes in meat types consumed in the UK 1974–2018 (from DEFRA [25]).

References

    1. Ritchie H., Roser M. Meat and Dairy Production. Published online at OurWorldInData.org. 2017. [(accessed on 1 February 2022)]. Available online: https://ourworldindata.org/meat-production.
    1. Bonnet C., Bouamra-Mechemache Z., Réquillart V., Treich N. Regulating meat consumption to improve health, the environment and animal welfare. Food Policy. 2020;97:101847. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101847. - DOI
    1. Basu S. The transitional dynamics of caloric ecosystems: Changes in the food supply around the world. Crit. Public Health. 2015;25:248–264. doi: 10.1080/09581596.2014.931568. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Milford A.B., Le Mouël C., Bodirsky B.L., Rolinski S. Drivers of meat consumption. Appetite. 2019;141:104313. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.06.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Salter A. The effects of meat consumption on global health. Sci. Tech. Rev. 2018;37:1. doi: 10.20506/rst.37.1.2739. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources