Prognosis of Implants with Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses in the Elderly Population: A Retrospective Study with a 5- to 10-Year Follow-Up
- PMID: 35885775
- PMCID: PMC9317632
- DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10071250
Prognosis of Implants with Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses in the Elderly Population: A Retrospective Study with a 5- to 10-Year Follow-Up
Abstract
This retrospective study aimed to investigate the survival rate of implants from 5 to 10 years after the placement of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (ISFDPs) and the management of implant loss in the elderly population. Elderly patients (≥65 years old) who had been treated with ISFDPs and followed up with for at least 5 years between October 2009 and March 2020 were enrolled. Patient profiles and implant-related data were extracted. The survival rate of implants up to 5 years as well as the 10-year cumulative survival rate were evaluated. The management of implant loss and prosthetic interventions were also investigated. In total, 195 patients (mean age: 70.1 ± 4.5 years old) and 687 implants (287 ISFDPs) were assessed. The 5-year survival rate was 99.0% and the 10-year cumulative survival rate was 98.1%. Seven of the eleven implants lost were lost due to peri-implantitis. Only three implants in two patients were placed after the loss of the implants; most were restored using non-invasive procedures. Two patients underwent a conversion from ISFDPs to removable prostheses. This study showed that high survival rates were observed in an elderly population with ISFDPs and that non-invasive procedures were often applied after the loss of an implant.
Keywords: elderly population; implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (ISFDPs); prosthetic intervention; survival rate.
Conflict of interest statement
One of the authors (K.K.) belongs to the Division of Advanced Dental Devices and Therapeutics, Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University. This division is endowed by GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan. However, GC Corporation had no specific role in this study. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Peri-Implant Diseases and Biologic Complications at Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses in Partially Edentulous Patients.J Prosthodont. 2020 Jun;29(5):429-435. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13165. Epub 2020 May 6. J Prosthodont. 2020. PMID: 32180293
-
Prosthesis Survival Rates and Prosthetic Complications of Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses in Partially Edentulous Patients.J Prosthodont. 2020 Jul;29(6):479-488. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13185. Epub 2020 May 19. J Prosthodont. 2020. PMID: 32364656
-
Clinical evaluation of full-arch screw-retained implant-supported fixed prostheses and full-arch telescopic-retained implant-supported fixed prostheses: A 5-12 year follow-up retrospective study.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019 Mar;30(3):197-205. doi: 10.1111/clr.13406. Epub 2019 Feb 5. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019. PMID: 30667092
-
Technical Complications and Prosthesis Survival Rates with Implant-Supported Fixed Complete Dental Prostheses: A Retrospective Study with 1- to 12-Year Follow-Up.J Prosthodont. 2020 Jan;29(1):3-11. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13119. Epub 2019 Nov 21. J Prosthodont. 2020. PMID: 31650669
-
Outcomes and Complication Rates of the Tooth-Implant-Supported Fixed Prosthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Jul/Aug;35(4):685-699. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8091. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020. PMID: 32724920
Cited by
-
The Comparison of Survival Rates between Narrow Diameter Implants and Standard Diameter Implants: An Updated Meta-analysis.Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2023 Feb 9;37:5. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.37.5. eCollection 2023. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2023. PMID: 37123329 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources