Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 5;10(7):1257.
doi: 10.3390/healthcare10071257.

Effectiveness of Digital Flipped Learning Evidence-Based Practice on Nurses' Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice: A Quasi-Experimental Trial

Affiliations

Effectiveness of Digital Flipped Learning Evidence-Based Practice on Nurses' Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice: A Quasi-Experimental Trial

Wen-Yi Chao et al. Healthcare (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: Evidence-based care has become critical in raising the quality of medical facilities. The implementation of evidence-based practice helps medical practitioners make better clinical decisions. Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate whether the innovative flipped teaching model could be as effective as the conventional teaching model in terms of knowledge, attitude, and practice and to confirm the continuous effect. Design: A quasi-experimental design using the flipped and conventional learning groups concurrently with repeat measurements was used. Setting: The setting was a 475-bed regional teaching hospital in Taiwan, from March to July 2020. Participants: The study included 114 licensed nurses who had worked longer than three months, with 57 participants each in two groups. Methods: The participants were assigned to two groups using a block randomization method. All participants completed questionnaires related to knowledge, attitude, and practice of EBP at four-time points: pre-test (T0) and immediately after intervention (T1), at month 1 (T2), and at month 3 (T3). Analysis of repeated generalized estimating equations was used. Results: The flipped and conventional learning groups had significant differences in knowledge, attitude, and practice at the T0 and T1 (p < 0.05). The flipped group was higher than the conventional group at T3 in the knowledge score (p = 0.001) and lower than the conventional group at T2 in the attitude score (p = 0.010). There were no significant differences between the two groups’ practice scores at different time points. There were no significantly different score changes for knowledge, attitude, and practice (p > 0.05). The interaction term only at T3 vs. T0 in the knowledge score was slightly different (p = 0.049) in primary outcome. Conclusion: The intervention methods of both groups were effective. Flipped learning is more flexible and has more time for discussion, which nurses favor. Under the policy promoted in the hospital, EBP combined with the nursing advancement system was standardized, and conventional learning also improved the learning effect.

Keywords: attitude; continuing; education; evidence-based practice; flipped learning; knowledge; learning; nurses; nursing; practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Experiment design for the conventional learning group and the flipped learning group.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The change in knowledge score between two groups at T0–T3. CL: conventional learning; FL: flipped learning. Total range: 0–10. T0: baseline; T1: immediately; T2: 1st month; T3: 3rd month.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The change of attitude score between two groups at T0–T3. CL: conventional learning; FL: flipped learning. Total range: 10–40. T0: baseline; T1: immediately; T2: 1st month; T3: 3rd month.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The change of practice score between groups at T0-T3. CL: conventional learning; FL: flipped learning. Total range: 10–50. T0: baseline; T1: immediately; T2: 1st month; T3: 3rd month.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fineout-Overholt E., Melnyk B.M., Schultz A. Transforming health care from the inside out: Advancing evidence-based practice in the 21st century. J. Prof. Nurs. 2005;21:335–344. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2005.10.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Melnyk B.M., Fineout-Overholt E., Stetler C., Allan J. Outcomes and implementation strategies from the first US evidence-based practice leadership summit. Worldviews Evid.-Based Nurs. 2005;2:113–121. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2005.00022.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jalali-Nia S.F., Salsali M., Dehghan-Nayeri N., Ebadi A. Effect of evidence-based education on Iranian nursing students’ knowledge and attitude. Nurs. Health Sci. 2011;13:221–227. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2011.00603.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim S.C., Brown C.E., Ecoff L., Davidson J.E., Gallo A., Klimpel K., Wickline M.A. Regional evidence-based practice fellowship program: Impact on evidence-based practice implementation and barriers. Clin. Nurs. Res. 2013;22:51–69. doi: 10.1177/1054773812446063. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Levin R.F., Fineout-Overholt E., Melnyk B.M., Barnes M., Vetter M.J. Fostering evidence-based practice to improve nurse and cost outcomes in a community health setting: A pilot test of the advancing research and clinical practice through close collaboration model. Nurs. Adm. Q. 2011;35:21–33. doi: 10.1097/NAQ.0b013e31820320ff. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources