Qualitative Interview Study of Gynecologic Oncologist Utilization of Recommended Same-Day Discharge Following Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy
- PMID: 35887579
- PMCID: PMC9320573
- DOI: 10.3390/jpm12071082
Qualitative Interview Study of Gynecologic Oncologist Utilization of Recommended Same-Day Discharge Following Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy
Abstract
Recent investigations have supported the safety and benefits of discharging women on the same day following a minimally invasive hysterectomy (MIH) for both benign and malignant indications. Not all eligible candidates for same-day discharge (SDD) are discharged the same day, and patients undergoing an MIH for malignant indications have decreased the odds of receiving SDD despite established safety. The objective of this study was to use qualitative interviews to explore physician decision making regarding SDD after an MIH for malignant indications. Six qualitative interviews of gynecologic oncologists were analyzed using recurrent theme analysis for distinct themes in physician decision making regarding SDD. Results suggest that physician-perceived barriers to SDD include patient health characteristics, patient social characteristics, and hospital-system factors. Cited factors influencing SDD include patient travel, social support, practice setting (urban vs. rural) and staff comfort with the recommendation. Obstructive sleep apnea and post-surgical oxygenation appear to be a recurring reason for unplanned admission. The utilization of SDD after an MIH in the gynecologic oncology patient population is influenced by patient, physician, and system factors. Addressing the physician's perceived barriers to SDD and catering recommendations to the gynecologic oncology population may increase utilization.
Keywords: gynecologic oncology; hysterectomy; minimally invasive surgery; same-day discharge; value of care.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Same-day discharge after minimal invasive hysterectomy: Applications for improved value of care.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Apr;259:140-145. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.02.020. Epub 2021 Feb 24. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021. PMID: 33667895
-
Same-Day Discharge in Minimally Invasive Surgery Performed by Gynecologic Oncologists: A Review of Patient Selection.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 May-Jun;27(4):816-825. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.10.023. Epub 2019 Nov 9. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 31715304
-
Historical and Forecasted Changes in Utilization of Same-day Discharge after Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022 Jul;29(7):855-861.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2022.03.011. Epub 2022 Mar 20. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022. PMID: 35321849
-
Factors Associated With Unplanned Admission in Patients Intended for Same Day Discharge After Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer.Surg Innov. 2022 Jun;29(3):336-342. doi: 10.1177/15533506211041882. Epub 2021 Sep 1. Surg Innov. 2022. PMID: 34470516
-
Minimally invasive hysterectomy same-day discharge: systematic review and meta-analysis of predictors.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Dec;310(6):2811-2822. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07794-7. Epub 2024 Oct 28. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024. PMID: 39467909
References
-
- Moore B.J., Steiner C.A., Davis P.H., Stocks C., Barrett M.L. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Rockville, MD, USA: 2006. Trends in Hysterectomies and Oophorectomies in Hospital Inpatient and Ambulatory Settings, 2005–2013: Statistical Brief #214; pp. 1–17. - PubMed
-
- Lee S.J., Calderon B., Gardner G.J., Mays A., Nolan S., Sonoda Y., Barakat R.R., Leitao M.M., Jr. The feasibility and safety of same-day discharge after robotic-assisted hysterectomy alone or with other procedures for benign and malignant indications. Gynecol. Oncol. 2014;133:552–555. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.04.006. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources