Nutritional Status after Roux-En-Y (Rygb) and One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (Oagb) at 6-Month Follow-Up: A Comparative Study
- PMID: 35889780
- PMCID: PMC9324253
- DOI: 10.3390/nu14142823
Nutritional Status after Roux-En-Y (Rygb) and One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (Oagb) at 6-Month Follow-Up: A Comparative Study
Abstract
Introduction: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) are two effective bariatric surgical procedures with positive outcomes in terms of weight loss, comorbidities remission, and adverse events profiles. OAGB seems to carry a higher risk of malnutrition, but existing data are controversial. The aim of this study is to objectively evaluate and compare malnutrition in patients undergoing RYGB and OAGB.
Methods: Retrospective monocentric study of obese patients undergoing RYGB or OAGB between the 15 September 2020 and the 31 May 2021. Nutritional status was assessed using the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score and compared between groups. The primary outcome was the mean CONUT score at 6 months. The secondary outcomes included the incidence of malnutrition, comorbidities, including hypertension, insulin resistance and type II diabetes mellitus, and weight loss.
Results: 78 patients were included: 30 underwent RYGB and 48 underwent OAGB. At 6-Month Follow-Up there was no difference between groups in the mean CONUT score nor in incidence of malnutrition. In both groups, the nutritional status significantly worsened 6 months after surgery (preoperative and postoperative score of 0.48 ± 0.9 and 1.38 ± 1.5; p = 0.0066 for RYGB and of 0.86 ± 1.5 and 1.45 ± 1.3; p = 0.0422 for OAGB). Type II Diabetes mellitus (DMII) and hypertension remission were significant in the OAGB group with a 100% relative remission in the DMII-OAGB group (p = 0.0265), and a 67% relative remission in the hypertension-OAGB group (p = 0.0031).
Conclusions: No difference in nutritional status has been detected between patients undergoing RYGB or OAGB at the 6-Month Follow-Up. Both procedures may have significant mal-absorptive effects leading to decline in nutritional status. OAGB may be more efficacious in inducing DMII and hypertension remission. Larger prospective studies dedicated specifically to nutritional status after gastric bypass are needed to confirm the impact of different bypass procedures on nutritional status.
Keywords: bariatric surgery; gastric bypass; metabolic surgery; nutrition; obesity.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score and Micronutrient Deficiency in Bariatric Patients: Midterm Outcomes of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass/Mini Gastric Bypass.Obes Surg. 2021 Aug;31(8):3715-3726. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05486-8. Epub 2021 May 24. Obes Surg. 2021. PMID: 34031850
-
Long-Term Weight Loss Results, Remission of Comorbidities and Nutritional Deficiencies of Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG), Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) and One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) on Type 2 Diabetic (T2D) Patients.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 20;17(20):7644. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207644. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 33092117 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term follow-up after sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus one-anastomosis gastric bypass: a prospective randomized comparative study of weight loss and remission of comorbidities.Surg Endosc. 2019 Feb;33(2):401-410. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6307-9. Epub 2018 Jun 25. Surg Endosc. 2019. Retraction in: Surg Endosc. 2021 Mar;35(3):1492. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08298-0. PMID: 29943058 Retracted. Clinical Trial.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass for Obesity: Comparison of the YOMEGA and Taiwan Studies.Obes Surg. 2019 Sep;29(9):3047-3053. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04065-2. Obes Surg. 2019. PMID: 31290104 Review.
-
One anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a meta-analysis.Clin Obes. 2018 Jun;8(3):159-169. doi: 10.1111/cob.12246. Epub 2018 Mar 24. Clin Obes. 2018. PMID: 29573175 Review.
Cited by
-
Single-Anastomosis Sleeve Jejunal Bypass as a Treatment for Morbid Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cureus. 2023 Dec 29;15(12):e51296. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51296. eCollection 2023 Dec. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 38283494 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Reduction in Serum Carotenoid Levels Following One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass.Nutrients. 2024 Aug 7;16(16):2596. doi: 10.3390/nu16162596. Nutrients. 2024. PMID: 39203733 Free PMC article.
-
Revisional surgery for malnutrition after SADI-S: prevalence, indications, techniques and outcomes.Updates Surg. 2024 Sep;76(5):1879-1885. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01900-9. Epub 2024 May 28. Updates Surg. 2024. PMID: 38805173 Free PMC article.
-
Malnutrition and infection lead to poor prognosis and heavy financial burden of patients with chronic heart failure.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Dec 1;9:1045262. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1045262. eCollection 2022. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022. PMID: 36531734 Free PMC article.
-
Diabetic Markers, Five Years after Bariatric Surgery.Middle East J Dig Dis. 2023 Oct;15(4):270-276. doi: 10.34172/mejdd.2023.357. Epub 2023 Oct 30. Middle East J Dig Dis. 2023. PMID: 38523888 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Gentileschi P., Di Paola M., Catarci M., Santoro E., Montemurro L., Carlini M., Nanni E., Alessandroni L., Angeloni R., Benini B., et al. Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A 1994–2001 audit on 13,718 operations in the area of Rome. Surg. Endosc. 2003;18:232–236. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8815-4. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Gagner M., Gentileschi P. Seminars in Laparoscopic Surgery. Sage; Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: 2001. Hand-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic resection. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials