Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 23;14(7):1374.
doi: 10.3390/v14071374.

Efficacy of Licensed Monoclonal Antibodies and Antiviral Agents against the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Sublineages BA.1 and BA.2

Affiliations

Efficacy of Licensed Monoclonal Antibodies and Antiviral Agents against the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Sublineages BA.1 and BA.2

Lia Fiaschi et al. Viruses. .

Abstract

Newly emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants may escape monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and antiviral drugs. By using live virus assays, we assessed the ex vivo inhibition of the B.1 wild-type (WT), delta and omicron BA.1 and BA.2 lineages by post-infusion sera from 40 individuals treated with bamlanivimab/etesevimab (BAM/ETE), casirivimab/imdevimab (CAS/IMD), and sotrovimab (SOT) as well as the activity of remdesivir, nirmatrelvir and molnupiravir. mAbs and drug activity were defined as the serum dilution (ID50) and drug concentration (IC50), respectively, showing 50% protection of virus-induced cytopathic effect. All pre-infusion sera were negative for SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing activity. BAM/ETE, CAS/IMD, and SOT showed activity against the WT (ID50 6295 (4355-8075) for BAM/ETE; 18,214 (16,248-21,365) for CAS/IMD; and 456 (265-592) for SOT) and the delta (14,780 (ID50 10,905-21,020) for BAM/ETE; 63,937 (47,211-79,971) for CAS/IMD; and 1103 (843-1334) for SOT). Notably, only SOT was active against BA.1 (ID50 200 (37-233)), whereas BA.2 was neutralized by CAS/IMD (ID50 174 (134-209) ID50) and SOT (ID50 20 (9-31) ID50), but not by BAM/ETE. No significant inter-variant IC50 differences were observed for molnupiravir (1.5 ± 0.1/1.5 ± 0.7/1.0 ± 0.5/0.8 ± 0.01 μM for WT/delta/BA.1/BA.2, respectively), nirmatrelvir (0.05 ± 0.02/0.06 ± 0.01/0.04 ± 0.02/0.04 ± 0.01 μM) or remdesivir (0.08 ± 0.04/0.11 ± 0.08/0.05 ± 0.04/0.08 ± 0.01 μM). Continued evolution of SARS-CoV-2 requires updating the mAbs arsenal, although antivirals have so far remained unaffected.

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; cell-based assay; mAbs; microneutralization assay; molnupiravir; nirmatrelvir; omicron sublineages; remdesivir.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

M.Z. reports consultancy for ViiV Healthcare, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, Theratechnologies, Merck Sharp and Dohme, and grants for his institution from ViiV Healthcare, Theratechnologies and Gilead Sciences outside the submitted work. B.R. received support for travel to meetings from Abbvie, Gilead Sciences, Janssen-Cilag, MSD, ViiV Healthcare, and Bristol Myers Squibb, and fees for attending advisory boards and speaker’s honoraria from Abbvie, Gilead Sciences, Janssen-Cilag, MSD, ViiV Healthcare, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. All other authors: no conflicts to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Ex vivo anti-SARS-CoV-2 wild type, delta, omicron (BA.1 and BA.2) neutralizing antibody titers measured in sera from 40 patients following infusion of bamlanivimab/etesevimab, casirivimab/imdevimab, or sotrovimab monoclonal antibodies. Blue dots, red squares and green triangles represents patients treated with bamlanivimab + etesevimab, casirivimab + indevimab and sotrovimab, respectively. Paired data were analyzed by the non-parametric Wilcoxon Signed Rank Sum test. NtAb titers before infusion were negative against each variant tested (not shown in figure). NtAb: neutralizing antibody; ID50: the reciprocal value of the sera dilution showing the 50% protection of virus-induced cytopathic effect; WT: wild type.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison between antiviral activity of EIDD-1931, Nirmatrelvir and Remdesivir against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 virus with (0.5 µM) or without the addition of P-gp inhibitor. On the x-axis is indicated the micromolar drug concentration in logarithmic scale. The horizontal dashed line indicates the drug IC50 corresponding to 50% cell viability whereas the dashed curves indicate the dose response fitting curve generated by GraphPad PRISM software version 6.01 (La Jolla, CA, USA).

References

    1. Markov P.V., Katzourakis A., Stilianakis N.I. Antigenic Evolution Will Lead to New SARS-CoV-2 Variants with Unpredictable Severity. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2022;20:251–252. doi: 10.1038/s41579-022-00722-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tao K., Tzou P.L., Nouhin J., Gupta R.K., de Oliveira T., Kosakovsky Pond S.L., Fera D., Shafer R.W. The Biological and Clinical Significance of Emerging SARS-CoV-2 Variants. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2021;22:757–773. doi: 10.1038/s41576-021-00408-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Takashita E., Kinoshita N., Yamayoshi S., Sakai-Tagawa Y., Fujisaki S., Ito M., Iwatsuki-Horimoto K., Chiba S., Halfmann P., Nagai H., et al. Efficacy of Antibodies and Antiviral Drugs against COVID-19 Omicron Variant. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022;386:995–998. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2119407. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Takashita E., Kinoshita N., Yamayoshi S., Sakai-Tagawa Y., Fujisaki S., Ito M., Iwatsuki-Horimoto K., Halfmann P., Watanabe S., Maeda K., et al. Efficacy of Antiviral Agents against the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Subvariant BA.2. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022;386:1475–1477. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2201933. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cathcart A.L., Havenar-Daughton C., Lempp F.A., Ma D., Schmid M.A., Agostini M.L., Guarino B., di iulio J., Rosen L.E., Tucker H., et al. The Dual Function Monoclonal Antibodies VIR-7831 and VIR-7832 Demonstrate Potent in Vitro and in Vivo Activity against SARS-CoV-2. bioRxiv. 2022:2021.03.09.434607. doi: 10.1101/2021.03.09.434607. - DOI

Publication types

Supplementary concepts