Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 17;9(3):269-277.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2022.06.007. eCollection 2022 Jul.

Effects of white noise on procedural pain-related cortical response and pain score in neonates: A randomized controlled trial

Affiliations

Effects of white noise on procedural pain-related cortical response and pain score in neonates: A randomized controlled trial

Xuyan Ren et al. Int J Nurs Sci. .

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the effects of white noise on pain-related cortical response, pain score, and behavioral and physiological parameters in neonates with procedural pain.

Methods: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted. Sixty-six neonates from the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit in a university-affiliated general hospital were randomly assigned to listen to white noise at 50 dB (experimental group) or 0 dB (control group) 2 min before radial artery blood sampling and continued until 5 min after needle withdrawal. Pain-related cortical response was measured by regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rScO2) monitored with near-infrared spectroscopy, and facial expressions and physiological parameters were recorded by two video cameras. Two assessors scored the Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised (PIPP-R) independently when viewing the videos. Primary outcomes were pain score and rScO2 during arterial puncture and 5 min after needle withdrawal. Secondary outcomes were pulse oximetric oxygen saturation (SpO2) and heart rate (HR) during arterial puncture, and duration of painful expressions. The study was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200055571).

Results: Sixty neonates (experimental group, n = 29; control group, n = 31) were included in the final analysis. The maximum PIPP-R score in the experimental and control groups was 12.00 (9.50, 13.00), 12.50 (10.50, 13.75), respectively (median difference -0.5, 95% CI -2.0 to 0.5), and minimum rScO2 was (61.22 ± 3.07)%, (61.32 ± 2.79)%, respectively (mean difference -0.325, 95% CI -1.382 to 0.732), without significant differences. During arterial puncture, the mean rScO2, HR, and SpO2 did not differ between groups. After needle withdrawal, the trends for rScO2, PIPP-R score, and facial expression returning to baseline were different between the two groups without statistical significance.

Conclusion: The white noise intervention did not show beneficial effects on pain-related cortical response as well as pain score, behavioral and physiological parameters in neonates with procedural pain.

Keywords: Facial expression; Intensive care units; Neonates; Premature infant pain profile-revised; Procedural pain; Radial artery; Regional cerebral oxygen saturation; White noise.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The timeline of the procedure. rScO2 = regional cerebral oxygen saturation. HR = heart rate. SpO2 = pulse oximetric oxygen saturation.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flow diagram. mITT = modified intent-to-treat. NIRS = near-infrared spectroscopy.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Graphical trend for the estimates of the PIPP-R score derived from the generalized linear mixed-effect model. The PIPP-R score was assessed every 30 s during the 5 min after the needle withdrawal, and the 10 assessment time points were labeled as T1 to T10, respectively. PIPP-R = premature infant pain profile.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Graphical trend for the estimates of the rScO2 derived from the generalized linear mixed-effect model. The rScO2 was assessed every 30 s during the 5 min after the needle withdrawal, and the 10 assessment time points were labeled as T1 to T10, respectively. rScO2 = regional cerebral oxygen saturation.

References

    1. Cruz M.D., Fernandes A.M., Oliveira C.R. Epidemiology of painful procedures performed in neonates: a systematic review of observational studies. Eur J Pain. 2016;20(4):489–498. doi: 10.1002/ejp.757. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ranger M., Grunau R.E. Early repetitive pain in preterm infants in relation to the developing brain. Pain Manag. 2014;4(1):57–67. doi: 10.2217/pmt.13.61. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McPherson C., Miller S.P., El-Dib M., Massaro A.N., Inder T.E. The influence of pain, agitation, and their management on the immature brain. Pediatr Res. 2020;88(2):168–175. doi: 10.1038/s41390-019-0744-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Walker S.M. Neonatal pain. Paediatr Anaesth. 2014;24(1):39–48. doi: 10.1111/pan.12293. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Balice-Bourgois C., Zumstein-Shaha M., Vanoni F., Jaques C., Newman C.J., Simonetti G.D. A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for acute procedural pain on neonates. Clin J Pain. 2020;36(5):390–398. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000808. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources