Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 15;14(3):177-186.
eCollection 2022.

Comparison of Tranexamic acid, Remifentanil, and Hydralazine on the bleeding volume during Dacryocystorhinostomy surgery

Affiliations

Comparison of Tranexamic acid, Remifentanil, and Hydralazine on the bleeding volume during Dacryocystorhinostomy surgery

Darioush Moradi Farsani et al. Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharmacol. .

Abstract

Background: Bleeding in Dacryocystorhinostomy (DRC) limits the surgeon's sight and access. Tranexamic acid, Remifentanil, and Hydralazine reduce intraoperative blood loss. However, no study has been carried out to compare the efficacy of the latter drugs during DCR surgery.

Methods: Ninety healthy candidates for DCR surgery with chronic Dacryocystitis (aging 20-80) were randomly assigned in groups of 30 to receive low doses of Tranexamic acid (TXA) (10 mg/kg with a maximum dose of 1000 mg), Remifentanil (0.1 µ/kg), or Hydralazine (0.1 mg/kg). All drugs were infused over 15 minutes before the initiation of surgery. The primary outcome was the bleeding volume during the surgery and until 2 hours in recovery. This study was approved by the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials with the code of IRCT20210614051574N10 (https://en.irct.ir/trial/62759).

Results: Thirty patients (mean age ± SD: 50.48±13.4) were investigated. Mean blood loss volume was lower in Remifentanil and Hydralazine groups compared with the TXA group (P<0.05); there was no significant difference (P>0.05) in bleeding volume between Remifentanil and Hydralazine groups (Tranexamic acid group: 146.83±91 ml, Remifentanil group: 77.6±52.1 ml, Hydralazine group: 80.0±48.7 ml, 95% confidence interval, P<0.05).

Conclusion: Our results show that Remifentanil and Hydralazine are more effective than Tranexamic acid in bleeding control.

Keywords: Blood loss; dacryocystorhinostomy; hemorrhage; induced hypotension.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Systolic blood pressure between the three study groups. 1: before the surgery, 2: 15 min during surgery, 3: 30 min during surgery, 4: 45 min during surgery, 5: 60 min during surgery, 6: 75 min during surgery, 7: at the moment of recovery entry, 8: 15 min in recovery, 9: 30 min in recovery, 10: 45 min in recovery, 11: 60 min in recovery.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Diastolic blood pressure between the three study groups. 1: before the surgery, 2: 15 min during surgery, 3: 30 min during surgery, 4: 45 min during surgery, 5: 60 min during surgery, 6: 75 min during surgery, 7: at the moment of recovery entry, 8: 15 min in recovery, 9: 30 min in recovery, 10: 45 min in recovery, 11: 60 min in recovery.
Figure 3
Figure 3
MAP between the three study groups. 1: before the surgery, 2: 15 min during surgery, 3: 30 min during surgery, 4: 45 min during surgery, 5: 60 min during surgery, 6: 75 min during surgery, 7: at the moment of recovery entry, 8: 15 min in recovery, 9: 30 min in recovery, 10: 45 min in recovery, 11: 60 min in recovery.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Heart rate between the three study groups. 1: before the surgery, 2: 15 min during surgery, 3: 30 min during surgery, 4: 45 min during surgery, 5: 60 min during surgery, 6: 75 min during surgery, 7: at the moment of recovery entry, 8: 15 min in recovery, 9: 30 min in recovery, 10: 45 min in recovery, 11: 60 min in recovery.
Figure 5
Figure 5
SPO2 between the three study groups. 1: before the surgery, 2: 15 min during surgery, 3: 30 min during surgery, 4: 45 min during surgery, 5: 60 min during surgery, 6: 75 min during surgery, 7: at the moment of recovery entry, 8: 15 min in recovery, 9: 30 min in recovery, 10: 45 min in recovery, 11: 60 min in recovery.

References

    1. Sobel RK, Aakalu VK, Wladis EJ, Bilyk JR, Yen MT, Mawn LA. A comparison of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy and external dacryocystorhinostomy: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2019;126:1580–1585. - PubMed
    1. Kang MG, Shim WS, Shin DK, Kim JY, Lee JE, Jung HJ. A systematic review of benefit of silicone intubation in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;11:81. - PMC - PubMed
    1. DeParis SW, Tian J, Rajaii F. Practice patterns in orbital decompression surgery among American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery members. Ophthalmol Ther. 2019;8:541–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Do Hyun Kim SIK, Jin HJ, Kim S, Hwang SH. The clinical efficacy of silicone stents for endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a meta-analysis. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;11:151. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tooley AA, Klingler KN, Bartley GB, Garrity JA, Woog JJ, Hodge D, Bradley EA. Dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct stenosis in the elderly (≥ 80 years of age) Ophthalmology. 2017;124:263–267. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources