Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jul 18;8(3):41.
doi: 10.3390/ijns8030041.

The Progress and Future of US Newborn Screening

Affiliations
Review

The Progress and Future of US Newborn Screening

Michael S Watson et al. Int J Neonatal Screen. .

Abstract

Progress in newborn screening (NBS) has been driven for 60 years by developments in science and technology, growing consumer advocacy, the actions of providers involved in the care of rare disease patients, and by federal and State government funding and policies. With the current explosion of clinical trials of treatments for rare diseases, the pressure for expansion has grown, and concerns about the capacity for improvement and growth are being expressed. Genome and exome sequencing (GS/ES) have now opened more opportunities for early identification and disease prevention at all points in the lifespan. The greatest challenge facing NBS stems from the conditions most amenable to screening, and new treatment development is that we are screening for rare genetic diseases. In addition, understanding the spectrum of severity requires vast amounts of population and genomic data. We propose recommendations on improving the NBS system and addressing specific demands to grow its capacity by: better defining the criteria by which screening targets are established; financing the NBS system's responsiveness to opportunities for expansion, including engagement and funding from stakeholders; creating a national quality assurance, data, IT, and communications infrastructure; and improving intra-governmental communications. While our recommendations may be specific to the United States, the underlying issues should be considered when working to improve NBS programs globally.

Keywords: clinical trials; genetic testing; newborn screening; public health; public health policy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. US Public Health Service Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Ten great public health achievements—United States, 2001–2010. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2011;60:619–623. - PubMed
    1. Wilson J.M., Jungner G. Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. (Public Health Paper Number 34) World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 1968.
    1. Bickel H., Gerrard J., Hickmans E.M. Influence of phenylalanine intake on phenylketonuria. Lancet. 1953;265:812–813. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(53)90473-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Green A. The first treatment for PKU: The pioneers—Birmingham 1951. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2021;7:19. doi: 10.3390/ijns7010019. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guthrie R. Blood screening for phenylketonuria (letter to the Journal) JAMA. 1961;178:863. doi: 10.1001/jama.1961.03040470079019. - DOI