Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 22;14(15):3558.
doi: 10.3390/cancers14153558.

Adverse Pathological Findings at Radical Prostatectomy following Active Surveillance: Results from the Movember GAP3 Cohort

Collaborators, Affiliations

Adverse Pathological Findings at Radical Prostatectomy following Active Surveillance: Results from the Movember GAP3 Cohort

Cristina Marenghi et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: Little is known about the consequences of delaying radical prostatectomy (RP) after Active Surveillance (AS) according to stringent or wider entry criteria. We investigated the association between inclusion criteria and rates, and timing of adverse pathological findings (APFs) among patients in GAP3 cohorts. Methods: APFs (GG ≥ 3, pT ≥ 3, pN > 0 and positive surgical margins [R1]) were accounted for in very low-risk (VLR: grade group [GG] 1, cT1, positive cores < 3, PSA < 10 ng/mL, PSA density [PSAD] < 0.15 ng/mL/cm3) and low-risk (LR: GG1, cT1-2, PSA ≤ 10 ng/mL) patients undergoing subsequent RP. The Kaplan−Meier method and log−rank test analyzed APF-free survival. Stratified mixed effects models analyzed association. Results: Out of 21,169 patients on AS, 1742 (VLR: 721; LR: 1021) underwent delayed RP. Most (60.8%) did not have APFs. APFs occurred more frequently (44.6% vs. 31.7%; OR 1.54, p < 0.001) and earlier (median time: 40.3 vs. 62.6 months; p < 0.001) in LR patients, and consisted of pT ≥ 3 (OR 1.47, p = 0.013) or R1 (OR 1.80, p < 0.001), but not of GG ≥ 3 or node involvement. Age (OR 1.05, p < 0.001), PSAD (OR 23.21, p = 0.003), and number of positive cores (OR 1.16, p = 0.004) were independently associated with APFs. Conclusions: AS stands as a safe option for low-risk patients, and most do not have APFs at surgery. Wider entry criteria are associated with pT3 and R1. The prognostic implications remain uncertain.

Keywords: active surveillance; classification; outcome; pathology; prognosis; prostatectomy; prostatic neoplasms; risk assessment; watchful waiting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Paul C. Boutros sits on the scientific advisory boards of Sage Bionetworks, Intersect Diagnostics Inc., and BioSymetrics Inc. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT flow diagram showing the selection process of the study population from the whole GAP3 AS cohort.

References

    1. Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L., Laversanne M., Soerjomataram I., Jemal A., Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71:209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Albertsen P.C., Hanley J.A., Fine J. 20-Year Outcomes Following Conservative Management of Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer. JAMA. 2005;293:2095–2101. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.17.2095. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lardas M., Liew M., Van den Bergh R.C., De Santis M., Bellmunt J., Van den Broeck T., Cornford P., Cumberbatch M.G., Fossati N., Gross T., et al. Quality of Life Outcomes after Primary Treatment for Clinically Localised Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review. Eur. Urol. 2017;72:869–885. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.06.035. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vernooij R.W., Lancee M., Cleves A., Dahm P., Bangma C.H., Aben K.K. Radical prostatectomy versus deferred treatment for localised prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2020;6:CD006590. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006590. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bill-Axelson A., Holmberg L., Garmo H., Taari K., Busch C., Nordling S., Häggman M., Andersson S.-O., Andrén O., Steineck G., et al. Radical Prostatectomy or Watchful Waiting in Prostate Cancer—29-Year Follow-up. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018;379:2319–2329. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1807801. - DOI - PubMed

Grants and funding