Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep;260(9):2877-2885.
doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05779-3. Epub 2022 Jul 27.

Evaluation of IOL power calculation with the Kane formula for pediatric cataract surgery

Affiliations

Evaluation of IOL power calculation with the Kane formula for pediatric cataract surgery

Olga Reitblat et al. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the accuracy of the Kane formula for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in the pediatric population.

Methods: The charts of pediatric patients who underwent cataract surgery with in-the-bag IOL implantation with one of two IOL models (SA60AT or MA60AC) between 2012 and 2018 in The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, CanFada, were retrospectively reviewed. The accuracy of IOL power calculation with the Kane formula was evaluated in comparison with the Barrett Universal II (BUII), Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraff Theoretical (SRK/T) formulas.

Results: Sixty-two eyes of 62 patients aged 6.2 (IQR 3.2-9.2) years were included. The SD values of the prediction error obtained by Kane (1.38) were comparable with those by BUII (1.34), Hoffer Q (1.37), SRK/T (1.40), Holaday 1 (1.41), and Haigis (1.50), all p > 0.05. A significant difference was observed between the Hoffer Q and Haigis formulas (p = 0.039). No differences in the median and mean absolute errors were found between the Kane formula (0.54 D and 0.91 ± 1.04 D) and BUII (0.50 D and 0.88 ± 1.00 D), Hoffer Q (0.48 D and 0.88 ± 1.05 D), SRK/T (0.72 D and 0.97 ± 1.00 D), Holladay 1 (0.63 D and 0.94 ± 1.05 D), and Haigis (0.57 D and 0.98 ± 1.13 D), p = 0.099.

Conclusion: This is the first study to investigate the Kane formula in pediatric cataract surgery. Our results place the Kane among the noteworthy IOL power calculation formulas in this age group, offering an additional means for improving IOL calculation in pediatric cataract surgery. The heteroscedastic statistical method was first implemented to evaluate formulas' predictability in children.

Keywords: Heteroscedastic statistical method; IOL power calculation in children; Intraocular lens power calculation predictability; Kane formula; Pediatric cataract surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sheeladevi S, Lawrenson JG, Fielder AR, Suttle CM (2016) Global prevalence of childhood cataract: a systematic review. Eye 30:1160–1169. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2016.156 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Nihalani BR, VanderVeen DK (2017) Benchmarks for outcome indicators in pediatric cataract surgery. Eye (Lond) 31:417–421. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2016.240 - DOI
    1. Xia T, Martinez CE, Tsai LM (2020) Update on intraocular lens formulas and calculations. Asia-Pac J Ophthalmol 9:186–193. https://doi.org/10.1097/APO.0000000000000293 - DOI
    1. Melles RB, Holladay JT, Chang WJ (2018) Accuracy of intraocular lens calculation formulas. Ophthalmology 125:169–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.08.027 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vasavada V, Shah SK, Vasavada VA et al (2016) Comparison of IOL power calculation formulae for pediatric eyes. Eye 30:1242–1250. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2016.171 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources