Clinical results of topography-guided laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis using the anterior corneal astigmatism axis and manifest refractive astigmatism axis
- PMID: 35895108
- DOI: 10.1007/s00417-022-05775-7
Clinical results of topography-guided laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis using the anterior corneal astigmatism axis and manifest refractive astigmatism axis
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the clinical results of primary topography-guided femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (TG-FS-LASIK) using the Pentacam-measured anterior corneal astigmatism axis (ACA) or manifest refractive astigmatism axis (MRA).
Methods: In this prospective cohort study, all eyes were treated with primary TG-FS-LASIK using the manifest cylinder. Thirty-two right eyes were treated using ACA with axis disparity > 5° in the experimental group, and 32 right eyes were treated using MRA with axis disparity ≤ 5° in the control group. Visual, refractive outcomes, and corneal higher-order aberrations were evaluated. Vector analysis of astigmatism was performed using Alpins method with the ASSORT software.
Results: The mean logMAR UDVA in the experimental group was - 0.12 ± 0.06, - 0.05 ± 0.08, and - 0.08 ± 0.08 at 1-week, 1-month, and 3-month follow-up, whereas - 0.05 ± 0.06, - 0.12 ± 0.06, and - 0.14 ± 0.06 in the control group (p = 0.017, p < 0.001, and p = 0.003). At 3-month follow-up, 79% eyes achieved a UDVA of 20/16 or better, 9% gained one line of corrected distance visual acuity, the mean manifest cylinder was - 0.375 ± 0.254 D, 84% showed a manifest cylinder within ± 0.50 D, the mean magnitude of difference vector was 0.41 ± 0.35 D, the mean absolute angle of error (AE) was 7.36 ± 6.21°, and 41% exhibited an arithmetic AE within ± 5° in the experimental group, whereas 94%, 19%, - 0.203 ± 0.148 D, 100%, 0.21 ± 0.15 D, 3.39 ± 3.68°, and 69% in the control group (all p < 0.05). The postoperative and preoperative corneal spherical aberrations were comparable in both groups (p > 0.05).
Conclusion: Primary topography-guided FS-LASIK using Pentacam-measured anterior corneal astigmatism axis exhibited slightly inferior clinical results to that using the manifest refractive astigmatism axis. Both methods achieved comparable postoperative and preoperative corneal spherical aberrations.
Keywords: Astigmatism; LASIK; Topography-guided; Vector analysis.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Comment in
-
Comment on: Clinical results of topography-guided laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis using the anterior corneal astigmatism axis and manifest refractive astigmatism axis.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023 Mar;261(3):891-892. doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05859-4. Epub 2022 Oct 10. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023. PMID: 36210376 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Primary Topography-Guided LASIK: Treating Manifest Refractive Astigmatism Versus Topography-Measured Anterior Corneal Astigmatism.J Refract Surg. 2019 Jan 1;35(1):15-23. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20181113-01. J Refract Surg. 2019. PMID: 30633783
-
Femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis with topography-guided or asphericity-adjusted derived data: a comparative contralateral eye study.BMC Ophthalmol. 2022 Apr 25;22(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02407-w. BMC Ophthalmol. 2022. PMID: 35468752 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Topography-Guided FS-LASIK With PAE Algorithm and Sirius Tomography Data for Correction of Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism.J Refract Surg. 2022 Apr;38(4):235-242. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20220131-01. Epub 2022 Apr 1. J Refract Surg. 2022. PMID: 35412929
-
A Randomized Comparative Study of Topography-Guided Versus Wavefront-Optimized FS-LASIK for Correcting Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism.J Refract Surg. 2019 Sep 1;35(9):575-582. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20190819-01. J Refract Surg. 2019. PMID: 31498415 Clinical Trial.
-
Topography-guided excimer laser ablation.Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2023 Jul 1;34(4):296-302. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000957. Epub 2023 Apr 4. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2023. PMID: 37014746 Review.
Cited by
-
Topography-guided excimer laser ablation in refractive surgery.Front Ophthalmol (Lausanne). 2024 Mar 7;4:1367258. doi: 10.3389/fopht.2024.1367258. eCollection 2024. Front Ophthalmol (Lausanne). 2024. PMID: 38984110 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Alpins N (2017) Practical Astigmatism: Planning and Analysis. Slack Incorporated, New Jersey
-
- Wallerstein A, Gauvin M, Qi SR, Cohen M (2020) Effect of the vectorial difference between manifest refractive astigmatism and anterior corneal astigmatism on topography-guided LASIK outcomes. J Refract Surg 36:449–458. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20200609-01 - DOI
-
- Kanellopoulos AJ (2016) Topography-modified refraction (TMR): adjustment of treated cylinder amount and axis to the topography versus standard clinical refraction in myopic topography-guided LASIK. Clin Ophthalmol 10:2213–2221. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S122345 - DOI
-
- Motwani M (2017) The use of WaveLight® Contoura to create a uniform cornea: the LYRA Protocol. Part 3: the results of 50 treated eyes. Clin Ophthalmol 11:915–921. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S133841 - DOI
-
- Lobanoff M, Stonecipher K, Tooma T, Wexler S, Potvin R (2020) Clinical outcomes after topography-guided LASIK: comparing results based on a new topography analysis algorithm with those based on manifest refraction. J Cataract Refract Surg 46:814–819. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000176 - DOI
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous