Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan;261(1):247-256.
doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05775-7. Epub 2022 Jul 27.

Clinical results of topography-guided laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis using the anterior corneal astigmatism axis and manifest refractive astigmatism axis

Affiliations

Clinical results of topography-guided laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis using the anterior corneal astigmatism axis and manifest refractive astigmatism axis

Chunlei Liu et al. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical results of primary topography-guided femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (TG-FS-LASIK) using the Pentacam-measured anterior corneal astigmatism axis (ACA) or manifest refractive astigmatism axis (MRA).

Methods: In this prospective cohort study, all eyes were treated with primary TG-FS-LASIK using the manifest cylinder. Thirty-two right eyes were treated using ACA with axis disparity > 5° in the experimental group, and 32 right eyes were treated using MRA with axis disparity ≤ 5° in the control group. Visual, refractive outcomes, and corneal higher-order aberrations were evaluated. Vector analysis of astigmatism was performed using Alpins method with the ASSORT software.

Results: The mean logMAR UDVA in the experimental group was - 0.12 ± 0.06, - 0.05 ± 0.08, and - 0.08 ± 0.08 at 1-week, 1-month, and 3-month follow-up, whereas - 0.05 ± 0.06, - 0.12 ± 0.06, and - 0.14 ± 0.06 in the control group (p = 0.017, p < 0.001, and p = 0.003). At 3-month follow-up, 79% eyes achieved a UDVA of 20/16 or better, 9% gained one line of corrected distance visual acuity, the mean manifest cylinder was - 0.375 ± 0.254 D, 84% showed a manifest cylinder within ± 0.50 D, the mean magnitude of difference vector was 0.41 ± 0.35 D, the mean absolute angle of error (AE) was 7.36 ± 6.21°, and 41% exhibited an arithmetic AE within ± 5° in the experimental group, whereas 94%, 19%, - 0.203 ± 0.148 D, 100%, 0.21 ± 0.15 D, 3.39 ± 3.68°, and 69% in the control group (all p < 0.05). The postoperative and preoperative corneal spherical aberrations were comparable in both groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: Primary topography-guided FS-LASIK using Pentacam-measured anterior corneal astigmatism axis exhibited slightly inferior clinical results to that using the manifest refractive astigmatism axis. Both methods achieved comparable postoperative and preoperative corneal spherical aberrations.

Keywords: Astigmatism; LASIK; Topography-guided; Vector analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alpins N (2017) Practical Astigmatism: Planning and Analysis. Slack Incorporated, New Jersey
    1. Wallerstein A, Gauvin M, Qi SR, Cohen M (2020) Effect of the vectorial difference between manifest refractive astigmatism and anterior corneal astigmatism on topography-guided LASIK outcomes. J Refract Surg 36:449–458. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20200609-01 - DOI
    1. Kanellopoulos AJ (2016) Topography-modified refraction (TMR): adjustment of treated cylinder amount and axis to the topography versus standard clinical refraction in myopic topography-guided LASIK. Clin Ophthalmol 10:2213–2221. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S122345 - DOI
    1. Motwani M (2017) The use of WaveLight® Contoura to create a uniform cornea: the LYRA Protocol. Part 3: the results of 50 treated eyes. Clin Ophthalmol 11:915–921. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S133841 - DOI
    1. Lobanoff M, Stonecipher K, Tooma T, Wexler S, Potvin R (2020) Clinical outcomes after topography-guided LASIK: comparing results based on a new topography analysis algorithm with those based on manifest refraction. J Cataract Refract Surg 46:814–819. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000176 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources