Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jul;33(5):1485-1493.
doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03337-5. Epub 2022 Jul 27.

The geriatric distal femur fracture: nail, plate or both?

Affiliations
Review

The geriatric distal femur fracture: nail, plate or both?

Jenna L Wilson et al. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Jul.

Abstract

Surgical fixation of distal femur fractures in geriatric patients is an evolving topic. Unlike hip fractures, treatment strategies for distal femur fractures are ill-defined and lack substantive high-quality evidence. With an increasing incidence and an association with significant morbidity and mortality, it is essential to understand existing treatment options and their supporting evidence. Current fixation methods include the use of either retrograde intramedullary nails, or plate and screw constructs. Due to the variability in fracture patterns, the unique anatomy of the distal femur, and the presence or absence or pre-existing implants, decision-making as to which method to use can be challenging. Recent literature has sought to describe the advantages and disadvantages of each, however, there is currently no consensus on a standard of care, and little randomized evidence is available that directly compares intramedullary nails with plating. Future randomized studies comparing intramedullary nails with plating constructs are necessary in order to develop a standard of care based on injury characteristics.

Keywords: Distal femur; Fracture; Geriatric; Intramedullary nail; Locking plate; Periprosthetic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jahangir AA, Cross WW, Schmidt AH (2010) Current management of distal femoral fractures. Curr Orthop Practice 21(2):193–197. https://doi.org/10.1097/BCO.0b013e3181bd6174 - DOI
    1. Myers P, Laboe P, Johnson KJ, Fredericks PD, Crichlow RJ, Maar DC et al (2018) Patient mortality in geriatric distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma 32(3):111–115. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001078 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Elsoe R, Ceccotti AA, Larsen P (2018) Population-based epidemiology and incidence of distal femur fractures. Int Orthop 42(1):191–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3665-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Della Rocca GJ, Leung KS, Pape HC (2011) Periprosthetic fractures: epidemiology and future projections. J Orthop Trauma 25(Suppl 2):S66-70. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e31821b8c28 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Streubel PN, Ricci WM, Wong A, Gardner MJ (2011) Mortality after distal femur fractures in elderly patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(4):1188–1196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1530-2 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources