Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 27;14(1):31.
doi: 10.1186/s13089-022-00279-1.

International consensus conference recommendations on ultrasound education for undergraduate medical students

Richard A Hoppmann  1 Jeanette Mladenovic  2 Lawrence Melniker  3 Radu Badea  4 Michael Blaivas  5 Miguel Montorfano  6 Alfred Abuhamad  7 Vicki Noble  8 Arif Hussain  9 Gregor Prosen  10 Tomás Villen  11 Gabriele Via  12 Ramon Nogue  13 Craig Goodmurphy  14 Marcus Bastos  15 G Stephen Nace  16 Giovanni Volpicelli  17 Richard J Wakefield  18 Steve Wilson  19 Anjali Bhagra  20 Jongyeol Kim  21 David Bahner  22 Chris Fox  23 Ruth Riley  24 Peter Steinmetz  25 Bret P Nelson  26 John Pellerito  27 Levon N Nazarian  28 L Britt Wilson  29 Irene W Y Ma  30 David Amponsah  31 Keith R Barron  32 Renee K Dversdal  33 Mike Wagner  34 Anthony J Dean  35 David Tierney  36 James W Tsung  37 Paula Nocera  38 José Pazeli  39 Rachel Liu  40 Susanna Price  41 Luca Neri  42 Barbara Piccirillo  43 Adi Osman  44 Vaughan Lee  45 Nitha Naqvi  46 Tomislav Petrovic  47 Paul Bornemann  48 Maxime Valois  49 Jean-Francoise Lanctot  49 Robert Haddad  50 Deepak Govil  51 Laura A Hurtado  52 Vi Am Dinh  53 Robert M DePhilip  54 Beatrice Hoffmann  55 Resa E Lewiss  56 Nayana A Parange  57 Akira Nishisaki  58 Stephanie J Doniger  59 Paul Dallas  60 Kevin Bergman  61 J Oscar Barahona  62 Ximena Wortsman  63 R Stephen Smith  64 Craig A Sisson  65 James Palma  66 Mike Mallin  67 Liju Ahmed  68 Hassan Mustafa  69
Affiliations

International consensus conference recommendations on ultrasound education for undergraduate medical students

Richard A Hoppmann et al. Ultrasound J. .

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to provide expert consensus recommendations to establish a global ultrasound curriculum for undergraduate medical students.

Methods: 64 multi-disciplinary ultrasound experts from 16 countries, 50 multi-disciplinary ultrasound consultants, and 21 medical students and residents contributed to these recommendations. A modified Delphi consensus method was used that included a systematic literature search, evaluation of the quality of literature by the GRADE system, and the RAND appropriateness method for panel judgment and consensus decisions. The process included four in-person international discussion sessions and two rounds of online voting.

Results: A total of 332 consensus conference statements in four curricular domains were considered: (1) curricular scope (4 statements), (2) curricular rationale (10 statements), (3) curricular characteristics (14 statements), and (4) curricular content (304 statements). Of these 332 statements, 145 were recommended, 126 were strongly recommended, and 61 were not recommended. Important aspects of an undergraduate ultrasound curriculum identified include curricular integration across the basic and clinical sciences and a competency and entrustable professional activity-based model. The curriculum should form the foundation of a life-long continuum of ultrasound education that prepares students for advanced training and patient care. In addition, the curriculum should complement and support the medical school curriculum as a whole with enhanced understanding of anatomy, physiology, pathophysiological processes and clinical practice without displacing other important undergraduate learning. The content of the curriculum should be appropriate for the medical student level of training, evidence and expert opinion based, and include ongoing collaborative research and development to ensure optimum educational value and patient care.

Conclusions: The international consensus conference has provided the first comprehensive document of recommendations for a basic ultrasound curriculum. The document reflects the opinion of a diverse and representative group of international expert ultrasound practitioners, educators, and learners. These recommendations can standardize undergraduate medical student ultrasound education while serving as a basis for additional research in medical education and the application of ultrasound in clinical practice.

Keywords: Curriculum recommendations; Education; International consensus conference; Medical student; Ultrasound; Undergraduate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The only authors declaring competing interests are listed below with their corresponding disclosure. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests. Richard Hoppmann, Patent Royalties on University of South Carolina license with EchoNous. Jeanette Mladenovic, Medical Advisory Board for EchoNous. Michael Blaivas, Consulting for Anavasi Diagnostics, Mendaera, and Intuitap. Bret P. Nelson, Medical Advisory Boards of DIA Imaging Analysis Ltd and EchoNous. Keith Reeves Barron Jr, Medical Advisory Board for EchoNous. Renee K Dversdal, Serves as Chief Medical Officer for Vave Health. David Tierney, Medical Advisory Board for EchoNous. James W. Tsung, Consultant for GE Healthcare and DIA Imaging Analysis Ltd. Paula Nocera, Associate on Cardiopriori Learning Platform. Rachel Liu, Consultant for Philips Healthcare and Caption Health and Medical Advisory Board for POCUSPro. Maxime Valois, Founding Partner in Sonoscope/EGLS Courses. Jean-Francois Lanctot, Founding Partner in Sonoscope/EGLS Courses. Resa E Lewiss, Medical Advisory Board for EchoNous. Kevin Bergman, Partner in Global Ultrasound Institute. Ximena Wortsman, Speaker Bureau of AbbVie.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A PubMed search of articles using ultrasound education medical school as the query
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
A PubMed search of articles using ultrasound education postgraduate as the query
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Literature search for relevant records

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Teichgräber UK, Meyer JM, Poulsen Nautrup C, von Rautenfeld DB. Ultrasound anatomy: a practical teaching system in human gross anatomy. Med Educ. 1996;30(4):296–298. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1996.tb00832.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brunner M, Moeslinger T, Spieckermann PG. Echocardiography for teaching cardiac physiology in practical student courses. Am J Physiol. 1995;268(6 Pt 3):S2–S9. doi: 10.1152/advances.1995.268.6.S2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moore CL, Copel JA. Point-of-care ultrasonography. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(8):749–757. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0909487. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kiss G, Korda D, Szabó G, et al. Oncological screening of kidney transplant patients: the role of ultrasound examination. Transplant Proc. 2019;51(4):1231–1233. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.04.016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ultrasound guidelines—emergency point of care and American College of Emergency Physicians Policy Statement. https://www.acep.org/globalassets/new-pdfs/policy-statements/ultrasound-.... Accessed 25 April 2022

LinkOut - more resources