Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct;40(10):931-941.
doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01176-0. Epub 2022 Jul 27.

Tools for the Economic Evaluation of Precision Medicine: A Scoping Review of Frameworks for Valuing Heterogeneity-Informed Decisions

Affiliations

Tools for the Economic Evaluation of Precision Medicine: A Scoping Review of Frameworks for Valuing Heterogeneity-Informed Decisions

Reka E Pataky et al. Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Background and objective: Precision medicine highlights the importance of exploring heterogeneity in the effectiveness and costs of interventions. Our objective was to identify and compare frameworks for valuing heterogeneity-informed decisions, and consider their strengths and weaknesses for application to precision medicine.

Methods: We conducted a scoping review to identify papers that proposed an analytical framework to place a value, in terms of costs and health benefits, on using heterogeneity to inform treatment selection. The search included English-language papers indexed in MEDLINE, Embase or EconLit, and a manual review of references and citations. We compared the frameworks qualitatively considering: the purpose and setting of the analysis; the types of precision medicine interventions where the framework could be applied; and the framework's ability to address the methodological challenges of evaluating precision medicine.

Results: Four analytical frameworks were identified: value of stratification, value of heterogeneity, expected value of individualised care and loss with respect to efficient diffusion. Each framework is suited to slightly different settings and research questions. All focus on maximising net benefit, and quantify the opportunity cost of ignoring heterogeneity by comparing individualised or stratified decisions to a means-based population-wide decision. Where the frameworks differ is in their approaches to uncertainty, and in the additional metrics they consider.

Conclusions: Identifying and utilising heterogeneity is at the core of precision medicine, and the ability to quantify the value of heterogeneity-informed decisions is critical. Using an analytical framework to value heterogeneity will help provide evidence to inform investment in precision medicine interventions, appropriately capturing the value of targeted health interventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. National Research Council. Toward precision medicine: building a knowledge network for biomedical research and a new taxonomy of disease. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011.
    1. Redekop WK, Mladsi D. The faces of personalized medicine: a framework for understanding its meaning and scope. Value Health. 2013;16(6 Suppl.):S4-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2013.06.005 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burns LC, Orsini L, L’Italien G. Value-based assessment of pharmacodiagnostic testing from early stage development to real-world use. Value Health. 2013;16(6 Suppl.):S16–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2013.06.007 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weymann D, et al. The cost and cost trajectory of whole-genome analysis guiding treatment of patients with advanced cancers. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2017;5(3):251–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.281 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Frank M, et al. Genome sequencing: a systematic review of health economic evidence. Health Econ Rev. 2013;3:29. https://doi.org/10.1186/2191-1991-3-29 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC

Publication types

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources