Ranking of addiction journals in eight widely used impact metrics
- PMID: 35895608
- PMCID: PMC9295211
- DOI: 10.1556/2006.2022.00020
Ranking of addiction journals in eight widely used impact metrics
Abstract
Background and aims: Journal metrics assess impact upon the research literature, and are now used to assess individual researchers in hiring and promotion decisions. This study compared the ranking of addiction journals according to eight widely used metrics; assessed the correlations between journal rankings; and assessed changes over time in metric scores.
Methods: Data pertaining to the 2020 scores on eight metrics for 43 journals were obtained and the top 20 ranking in each compared and the correlations between rankings assessed. The Impact Factor was employed to assess changes over time.
Results: Ignoring the two categorization systems used by some metrics, 31 journals appeared in at least one metric top 20 and 11 in all eight. The top rank in each was occupied by one of three journals. Three-quarters of the correlations between rankings were above 6.0. The number of journals with an Impact Factor rose from 23 in 1997 to 38 in 2020, and the journals added tended to focus on addictions other than alcohol and drugs or have a specific focus.
Conclusions and discussion: The results indicate a concentration of journals at the top of the metrics and moderate to strong agreement between them, but almost three-quarters of journals appeared in at least one metric. The longitudinal data reflect both a broadening and specialization of the addiction field. The study limitations include exclusion of some journals and metrics.
Keywords: addiction research; bibliometrics; journal impact factors; journal metrics; substance abuse research.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise, relevant to the subject of this article.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Journal Metrics in Psychiatry: What do the rankings tell us?J Affect Disord. 2021 May 15;287:354-358. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.03.039. Epub 2021 Mar 19. J Affect Disord. 2021. PMID: 33819734
-
Dermatology journals from India: A critical appraisal of the journal metrics.Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2023 [SEASON];90(1):85-90. doi: 10.25259/IJDVL_1126_2022. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2023. PMID: 37317739
-
Publication Metrics of Dental Journals - What is the Role of Self Citations in Determining the Impact Factor of Journals?J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2015 Sep;15(3):97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2014.12.006. Epub 2015 Jul 18. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2015. PMID: 26337577
-
A Review of Journal Impact Metrics and Characteristics to Assist Emergency Medicine Investigators with Manuscript Submission Decisions.West J Emerg Med. 2020 Jul 2;21(4):877-882. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.4.47030. West J Emerg Med. 2020. PMID: 32726259 Free PMC article.
-
Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics.Asian J Androl. 2016 Mar-Apr;18(2):296-309. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.171582. Asian J Androl. 2016. PMID: 26806079 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation and Comparison of Academic Impact and Disruptive Innovation Level of Medical Journals: Bibliometric Analysis and Disruptive Evaluation.J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 31;26:e55121. doi: 10.2196/55121. J Med Internet Res. 2024. PMID: 38820583 Free PMC article.
References
-
- American Society for Cell Biology . (2013). The San Francisco declaration on research assessment (DORA). American Society for Cell Biology. http://www.ascb.org/dora/.
-
- Archambault, E. , & Lariviére, V. (2009). History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences. Scientometrics , 79, 639–653. 10.1007/s11192-007-2036-x. - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources