Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 25;19(15):9044.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159044.

Bibliometric Analysis of Health Technology Research: 1990~2020

Affiliations

Bibliometric Analysis of Health Technology Research: 1990~2020

Xiaomei Luo et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

This paper aims to summarize the publishing trends, current status, research topics, and frontier evolution trends of health technology between 1990 and 2020 through various bibliometric analysis methods. In total, 6663 articles retrieved from the Web of Science core database were analyzed by Vosviewer and CiteSpace software. This paper found that: (1) The number of publications in the field of health technology increased exponentially; (2) there is no stable core group of authors in this research field, and the influence of the publishing institutions and journals in China is insufficient compared with those in Europe and the United States; (3) there are 21 core research topics in the field of health technology research, and these research topics can be divided into four classes: hot spots, potential hot spots, margin topics, and mature topics. C21 (COVID-19 prevention) and C10 (digital health technology) are currently two emerging research topics. (4) The number of research frontiers has increased in the past five years (2016-2020), and the research directions have become more diverse; rehabilitation, pregnancy, e-health, m-health, machine learning, and patient engagement are the six latest research frontiers.

Keywords: Citespace; VOSviewer; bibliometrics; emerging research topic; healthy technology; research frontier.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A flowchart representing retrieval strategies for health technology articles from the WOS database and the inclusion criteria for the study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of publications and growth trend.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Institutional co-authorship map of health technology research. The node area represents the number of articles issued by institutions, the links between nodes represent the cooperation between institutions, and the distance and the width of the links between nodes represent the cooperation intensity between institutions.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Keywords co-occurrence map of health technology research.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Strategic diagram of health technology research topics.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Health technology keywords with the strongest citation bursts.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Oortwijn W., Banta D., Vondeling H., Bouter L. Identification and priority setting for health technology assessment in The Netherlands: Actors and activities. Health Policy. 1999;47:241–253. doi: 10.1016/S0168-8510(99)00020-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eldar R. Health technology: Challenge to public health. Croat. Med. J. 2002;43:470–474. - PubMed
    1. Garrido M.V., Gerhardus A., Røttingen J.A., Busse R. Developing health technology assessment to address health care system needs. Health Policy. 2010;94:196–202. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.10.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sixtieth World Health Assembly WHA60.29 Health Technologies. [(accessed on 25 December 2020)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/healthsystems/WHA60_29.pdf.
    1. Inahta Hta Glossary. [(accessed on 25 December 2020)]. Available online: http://htaglossary.net/health-technology.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources