Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug;57(4):568-574.
doi: 10.1177/00185787211066460. Epub 2021 Dec 30.

Is Cefoxitin a Carbapenem Sparing Agent in the Management of Urinary Tract Infections Caused by ESBL Producing Enterobacterales?

Affiliations

Is Cefoxitin a Carbapenem Sparing Agent in the Management of Urinary Tract Infections Caused by ESBL Producing Enterobacterales?

Wasim S El Nekidy et al. Hosp Pharm. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Cefoxitin has shown in vitro activity against Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL) producing Enterobacterales. Outcome data regarding cefoxitin as a carbapenem sparing agent in the management of urinary tract infections (UTI) are scarce. We sought to evaluate the clinical and microbiologic efficacy of cefoxitin as compared to ertapenem. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted at our quaternary care institution between May 2015 and March 2019. We identified all patients who received cefoxitin for the treatment of UTI during the study period and used Charlson Comorbidity Index to select a matching cohort from patients who received ertapenem. Primary end points were clinical and microbiological cure. Results: Thirty patients who received cefoxitin were matched with 55 patients who received ertapenem. Clinical cure was marginally in favor of ertapenem: 83.2% in cefoxitin group versus 96.8% in ertapenem group (P = .042). However, 90-day recurrence was in favor of cefoxitin: 13.5% in cefoxitin group versus 34.8% in ertapenem group (P = .045). Microbiologic cure was not significant between the 2 groups with 88.6% success in cefoxitin versus 100% in ertapenem. Additionally, the group difference on 30-day recurrence or relapse rates and the 90-day mortality rate were not clinically significant. Conclusion: Cefoxitin achieved similar microbiologic cure rate when compared to ertapenem for the treatment of UTI caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacterales. No significant differences were found in 30-day recurrence/relapse or mortality rates. Larger randomized controlled trials are required to identify the clinical sittings in which cefoxitin could be used as a carbapenem-sparing agent in the treatment of UTI.

Keywords: ESBL; UTI; carbapenem; cefoxitin; sparing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: The content of this paper has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere. Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Paterson DL. Resistance in gram-negative bacteria: Enterobacteriaceae. Am J Infect Control. 2006;34(5 Suppl 1):S20-S28; discussion S64. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2006.05.238 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alyamani EJ, Khiyami AM, Booq RY, Majrashi MA, Bahwerth FS, Rechkina E. The occurrence of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli carrying aminoglycoside resistance genes in urinary tract infections in Saudi Arabia. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2017;16(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12941-016-0177-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Drawz SM, Papp-Wallace KM, Bonomo RA. New β-lactamase inhibitors: a therapeutic renaissance in an MDR world. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(4):1835-1846. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00826-13 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rawat D, Nair D. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases in gram negative bacteria. J Glob Infect Dis. 2010;2(3):263-274. doi: 10.4103/0974-777x.68531 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Paterson DL, Bonomo RA. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases: a clinical update. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005;18(4):657-686. doi: 10.1128/CMR.18.4.657-686.2005 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources