Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Oct 1:188:30-37.
doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2022.07.017. Epub 2022 Jul 25.

Pilot randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of random nicotine delivery on cigarettes per day and smoke exposure

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Pilot randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of random nicotine delivery on cigarettes per day and smoke exposure

Jessica M Yingst et al. Brain Res Bull. .

Abstract

Background: Many smokers report attempting to quit each year, yet most relapse, in part due to exposure to smoking-related cues. It is hypothesized that extinction of the cue-drug association could be facilitated through random nicotine delivery (RND), thus making it easier for smokers to quit. The current study aimed to evaluate the effects of RND on smoking cessation-related outcomes including cigarettes per day (CPD) and exhaled carbon monoxide (CO).

Methods: Participants were current smokers (>9 CPD) interested in quitting. Novel trans-mucosal, orally dissolving nicotine films, developed by Bionex Pharmaceuticals, were used in the study. The pharmacokinetic profile of these films was assessed in single (Experiment 1) and multiple-dose (Experiment 2) administrations prior to the smoking cessation study (Experiment 3). In Experiment 3, participants were randomized 1:1:1 to recieve 4 nicotine films per day of either: placebo delivery (0 mg), steady-state delivery (2 mg), or random nicotine delivery (RND) (0 mg or 4 mg). After two weeks, participants were advised to quit (target quit date, TQD) and were followed up 4 weeks later to collect CPD and CO and to measure dependence (Penn State Cigarette Dependence Index; PSCDI) and craving (Questionnaire of Smoking Urges; QSU-Brief). Means and frequencies were used to describe the data and repeated measures ANOVA was used to determine differences between groups.

Results: The pharmacokinetic studies (Experiment 1 and 2) demonstrated that the films designed for this study delivered nicotine as expected, with the 4 mg film delivering a nicotine boost of approximately 12.4 ng/mL across both the single and the multiple dose administration studies. The films reduced craving for a cigarette and were well-tolerated, overall, and caused no changes in blood pressure or heart rate. Using these films in the cessation study (Experiment 3) (n = 45), there was a significant overall reduction in cigarettes smoked per day (CPD) and in exhaled CO, with no significant differences across groups (placebo, steady-state, RND). In addition, there were no group differences in dependence or craving. Adverse events included heartburn, hiccups, nausea, and to a lesser extent, vomiting and anxiety and there were no differences across groups.

Conclusion: Overall, this pilot study found that RND via orally dissolving films was feasible and well tolerated by participants. However, RND participants did not experience a greater reduction in self-reported CPD and exhaled CO, compared with participants in the steady-state and placebo delivery groups. Future studies to evaluate optimal RND parameters with larger sample sizes are needed to fully understand the effect of RND on smoking cessation-related outcomes.

Keywords: Nicotine delivery; Nicotine film; Nicotine replacement therapy; Pharmacokinetics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

JF has done paid consulting for pharmaceutical companies involved in producing smoking cessation medications, including GSK, Pfizer, Novartis, J&J, and Cypress Bioscience. HST is the Director of Ventures & Technologies at Bionex Pharmaceuticals LLC. The other authors have no disclosures to report related to this publication.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Mean plasma nicotine concentrations by nicotine film dose group (Experiment 1: Single Dose Administration).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Mean questionnaire of smoking urges-brief change scores from baseline by nicotine film dose group (Experiment 1: Single-Dose Administration).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Mean Plasma Nicotine Concentrations by Nicotine Film Dose Group (Experiment 2: Multiple-Dose Administration).
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
CONSORT diagram (Experiment 3: Cessation Study).
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
CPD and CO reduction from baseline to the 4-week Follow-up (Experiment 3: Cessation Study).
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
FTND and PSCDI Score from Baseline to the 4-week Follow-up (Experiment 3: Cessation Study).
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7.
Aversion, Psychological Reward, and Relief as a function of group at the 4-week Follow-up (Experiment 3: Cessation Study).
Fig. 8.
Fig. 8.
Correlation of relief and psychological reward (panel A) and relief and CO reduction (panel B) and psychological reward and CO reduction (panel C) from baseline to the 4-week follow-up. (Experiment 3: Cessation Study).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Azzopardi D, Ebajemito J, McEwan M, et al., 2022. A randomised study to assess the nicotine pharmacokinetics of an oral nicotine pouch and two nicotine replacement therapy products. Sci. Rep. 12 (1) (6949). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Babb S, Malarcher A, Schauer G, Asman K, Jamal A, 2017. Quitting smoking among adults - United States, 2000–2015. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 65 (52), 1457–1464. - PubMed
    1. Belita E, Sidani S, 2015. Attrition in smoking cessation intervention studies: a systematic review. Can. J. Nurs. Res. = Rev. Can. De. Rech. En. Sci. Infirm. 47 (4), 21–40. - PubMed
    1. Brunzell DH, Stafford AM, Dixon CI, 2015. Nicotinic receptor contributions to smoking: insights from human studies and animal models. Curr. Addict. Rep. 2 (1), 33–46. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Choi JH, Dresler CM, Norton MR, Strahs KR, 2003. Pharmacokinetics of a nicotine polacrilex lozenge. Nicot. Tob. Res. 5 (5), 635–644. - PubMed

Publication types