Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 28;12(7):e057197.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057197.

Psychological distress and associated factors among healthcare professionals in Ethiopia during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study

Demeke Demilew  1 , Dessie Abebaw Angaw  2 , Berhanie Getnet  3 , Bizuneh Tesfaye  3 , Asmamaw Atnafu  4 , Zewudu Andualem  5 , Habtamu Kerebih  3
Affiliations

Psychological distress and associated factors among healthcare professionals in Ethiopia during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study

Demeke Demilew et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of the study was to assess psychological distress (depression, anxiety and stress) and associated factors among healthcare professionals working at the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia.

Design: Institution-based cross-sectional study.

Setting: This study was conducted at the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital.

Participants: Study participants were healthcare professionals from University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital. They were selected for the study using a stratified sampling technique.

Measurement: Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire. The 21-item Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale was used to assess the depression, anxiety and stress levels. Descriptive and analytical statistics were used to present the findings. To determine the predictor variables for depression, anxiety and stress, a binary logistic regression model was fitted. Finally, variables with p value <0.05 in the final model were declared as significantly associated with psychological distress.

Result: Almost half (49.5) of the participants have psychological distress. The prevalence of depression, anxiety and stress during the COVID-19 pandemic among healthcare workers was 167 (42.7%), 201 (51.4%) and 242 (61.9%), respectively. In multivariable analysis, respondents found in the ages between 35 and 44; unmarried marital status; educational status with specialty, subspecialty and PhD holders; anaesthesia professionals; and healthcare professionals with known medical illness were significantly associated with depression. Unmarried marital status, anaesthesia professional, laboratory technologist and living with family were significantly associated with anxiety. Unmarried marital status; educational status with specialty, subspecialty and PhD holders; and anaesthesia professional were also statistically significant with stress.

Conclusion and recommendation: The prevalence of depression, anxiety and stress during the COVID-19 pandemic among the Gondar University healthcare professionals was high. This could contribute to implementation of mitigation measures in a standardised and sustainable manner and emphasis should be given to this aspect of health even for future similar and unanticipated events.

Keywords: COVID-19; adult psychiatry; anxiety disorders; depression & mood disorders; epidemiology; suicide & self-harm.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic presentation of sampling procedure.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Prevalence of depression, anxiety and stress during the COVID-19 pandemic among healthcare professionals at the Gondar University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, 2020.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ndetei DM, Khasakhala LI, Kuria MW, et al. The prevalence of mental disorders in adults in different level general medical facilities in Kenya: a cross-sectional study. Ann Gen Psychiatry 2009;8:1. 10.1186/1744-859X-8-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Drapeau A, Marchand A, Beaulieu-Prévost D. Epidemiology of psychological distress, mental illnesses-understanding, prediction and control 2012;69:105–6.
    1. Preti E, Di Mattei V, Perego G, et al. The psychological impact of epidemic and pandemic outbreaks on healthcare workers: rapid review of the evidence. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2020;22:1–22. 10.1007/s11920-020-01166-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020;395:497–506. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maunder RG, Lancee WJ, Balderson KE, et al. Long-term psychological and occupational effects of providing hospital healthcare during SARS outbreak. Emerg Infect Dis 2006;12:1924–32. 10.3201/eid1212.060584 - DOI - PMC - PubMed