Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul;43(4):225-230.
doi: 10.4082/kjfm.21.0168. Epub 2022 Jul 19.

Changes in Diagnostic Performance of Thyroid Cancer Screening before and after the Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System Revision

Affiliations

Changes in Diagnostic Performance of Thyroid Cancer Screening before and after the Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System Revision

Na Hyun Kim et al. Korean J Fam Med. 2022 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Since the era of "thyroid cancer epidemic," many Korean academic societies discouraged the use of ultrasonography in healthy individuals and revised the Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System to address the overscreening and overdiagnosis issues. This study aimed to evaluate the change in the diagnostic effectiveness of thyroid cancer screening over the last decade.

Methods: This single-center, retrospective observational study analyzed the data of 125,962 thyroid nodules obtained during cancer screening at the health promotion center of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital from 2010 to 2019. Only 327 thyroid cancer cases pathologically confirmed by fine-needle aspiration (FNA) were included in the study. The strength of the association between the number of FNA and (1) the number of thyroid cancer diagnoses, (2) the positive predictive values (PPVs), and (3) the difference in PPV from the previous year were evaluated using Pearson's correlation analysis.

Results: The number of thyroid FNA biopsies as well as the thyroid cancer diagnoses decreased from 2010 to 2019 (166 to 48 [-71.1%] vs. 43 to 22 [-48.8%]). The PPV of FNA biopsies increased from 25.9% to 45.8% (+76.8%) and was negatively correlated with the number of FNA biopsies performed (R=-0.87, P<0.001). The difference in PPV from the previous year increased similarly but without statistical significance (R=-0.59, P=0.09).

Conclusion: The diagnostic efficiency of thyroid cancer screening has increased over the last decade, as evidenced by the increasing PPV of FNA biopsies.

Keywords: Diagnostic Imaging; Early Detection of Cancer; Fine-Needle Biopsy; Predictive Value of Tests; Thyroid Neoplasms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Figure. 1.
Figure. 1.
Flowchart showing the total number of population included in the study. US, ultrasonography; FNA, fine-needle aspiration.
Figure. 2.
Figure. 2.
Pearson’s correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate the correlation between the annual number of thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy performed in patients visiting from 2010 to 2019 and (A) the annual number of thyroid cancer diagnosis confirmed through FNA biopsy, (B) the positive predictive values (PPV), and (C) the difference in PPV from previous year. The linear lines indicate significant correlations (P<0.05). *The PPV were calculated. The results are shown in the fourth column of Table 1. See the commentary in Table 1 for a detailed equation. Differences in PPV from that in the previous year were calculated using the following equation: difference in PPV=(number of thyroid cancer diagnoses–number of thyroid cancer diagnoses from previous year)/(number of thyroid FNA–number of thyroid FNA from previous year). The calculated annual changes can be both positive and negative.
Figure. 3.
Figure. 3.
Positive predictive values* (%) of thyroid fine-needle aspirations performed on patients visiting the health promotion center from 2010 to 2019. *Positive predictive values were calculated and shown on the fourth column of Table 1. See commentary on Table 1 for a detailed equation.

References

    1. James BC, Mitchell JM, Jeon HD, Vasilottos N, Grogan RH, Aschebrook-Kilfoy B. An update in international trends in incidence rates of thyroid cancer, 1973-2007. Cancer Causes Control. 2018;29:465–73. - PubMed
    1. Ahn HS, Kim HJ, Welch HG. Korea’s thyroid-cancer “epidemic”: screening and overdiagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1765–7. - PubMed
    1. Korean Statistical Information Service . Daejeon: Statistics Korea; Cancer incident cases and incidence rates by site (24 items), sex, age group, 1999-2018 [Internet] c2022 [cited 2021 Jun 7]. Available from: https://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=117&tblId=DT_117N_A00023&con....
    1. Vaccarella S, Franceschi S, Bray F, Wild CP, Plummer M, Dal Maso L. Worldwide thyroid-cancer epidemic?: the increasing impact of overdiagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:614–7. - PubMed
    1. Yi KH, Kim SY, Kim DH, Kim SW, Na DG, Lee YJ, et al. The Korean guideline for thyroid cancer screening. J Korean Med Assoc. 2015;58:302–12.

LinkOut - more resources