Perioperative Outcomes of a Hydrocortisone Protocol after Endonasal Surgery for Pituitary Adenoma Resection
- PMID: 35903648
- PMCID: PMC9324319
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735588
Perioperative Outcomes of a Hydrocortisone Protocol after Endonasal Surgery for Pituitary Adenoma Resection
Abstract
Introduction In pituitary adenomas (PAs), the use of postoperative steroid supplementation remains controversial, as it reduces peritumoral edema and sinonasal complaints but disrupts the detection of adrenal insufficiency (AI). It is unclear whether postoperative cortisol supplementation has a measurable effect on improving outcomes in patients with pituitary adenoma undergoing endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (ETS). The objective of the study was to evaluate a postoperative steroid treatment protocol on various surgical outcomes in patients with PA undergoing ETS. Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed for patients undergoing ETS from 2005 to 2020 for PA at a single tertiary academic center. Patients were divided into two groups: those managed by a routine postoperative glucocorticoid supplementation protocol (steroid protocol) and those who received supplementation based on postoperative cortisol laboratory assessment (steroid sparing protocol). Management was otherwise the same between groups. Evaluation of length of stay (LOS), sinonasal outcomes, 30-day readmission, and perioperative complications, including AI, were performed. Results Among 535 patients, 21% ( n = 111) received postoperative steroids, while the remainder ( n = 424) did not. There were no differences in mean LOS (3 vs. 3 days, p = 0.72), sinonasal complaints (27 vs. 19%, p = 0.12), 30-day readmission (5% vs. 5%, p = 0.44), and perioperative complications (5 vs. 5%, p = 0.79) between both the groups. A multivariate model supported that both groups were comparable in predicting LOS, 30-day readmission, and complications. No reduction in readmission for AI was seen. Conclusion Routine administration of postoperative glucocorticoids did not significantly improve patient outcomes in patients with PA who underwent ETS.
Keywords: adenoma; adrenal crisis; adrenal insufficiency; cortisol; hydrocortisone; hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis; outcome; pituitary; tumor.
Thieme. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest None declared.
Similar articles
-
Early morning cortisol levels as predictors of short-term and long-term adrenal function after endonasal transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas and Rathke's cleft cysts.World Neurosurg. 2013 Nov;80(5):569-75. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2012.07.034. Epub 2012 Aug 14. World Neurosurg. 2013. PMID: 22902358
-
Comparison of intraoperative cortisol levels after preoperative hydrocortisone administration versus placebo in patients without adrenal insufficiency undergoing endoscopic transsphenoidal removal of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas: a double-blind randomized trial.J Neurosurg. 2020 Jan 24;134(2):526-534. doi: 10.3171/2019.11.JNS192381. Print 2021 Feb 1. J Neurosurg. 2020. PMID: 31978882
-
Selective perioperative steroid supplementation protocol in patients undergoing endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas.Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Oct;162(10):2381-2388. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04530-3. Epub 2020 Aug 9. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020. PMID: 32772164
-
The Cost Effectiveness of Implementation of a Postoperative Endocrinopathy Management Protocol after Resection of Pituitary Adenomas.J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2022 Jun 29;83(6):618-625. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1750718. eCollection 2022 Dec. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2022. PMID: 36393880 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery in elderly patients with pituitary adenomas.J Neurosurg. 2015 Jul;123(1):31-8. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.JNS14372. Epub 2015 Apr 3. J Neurosurg. 2015. PMID: 25839926 Review.
Cited by
-
Pituitary Stalk Morphology as a Predictor of New-Onset Adrenocortical Insufficiency and Arginine Vasopressin Deficiency after Transsphenoidal Resections of Pituitary Macroadenomas: A Retrospective Single-Center Study with a Focus on iMRI.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Aug 2;15(15):3929. doi: 10.3390/cancers15153929. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37568744 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Fernández-Balsells M M, Murad M H, Barwise A. Natural history of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas and incidentalomas: a systematic review and metaanalysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(04):905–912. - PubMed
-
- Gittleman H, Ostrom Q T, Farah P D. Descriptive epidemiology of pituitary tumors in the United States, 2004-2009. J Neurosurg. 2014;121(03):527–535. - PubMed
-
- Ezzat S, Asa S L, Couldwell W T. The prevalence of pituitary adenomas: a systematic review. Cancer. 2004;101(03):613–619. - PubMed
-
- Freda P U, Post K D.Differential diagnosis of sellar masses Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 1999280181–117., vi - PubMed
-
- Gsponer J, De Tribolet N, Déruaz J P. Diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of pituitary tumors and other abnormal intrasellar masses. Retrospective analysis of 353 patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 1999;78(04):236–269. - PubMed