Mapping of instruments in Japanese for measuring evidence-based practice among clinical nurses: A scoping review
- PMID: 35903956
- DOI: 10.1111/ijn.13086
Mapping of instruments in Japanese for measuring evidence-based practice among clinical nurses: A scoping review
Abstract
Aims: This work aims to map instruments available in Japanese that have been assessed for reliability or validity for measuring evidence-based practice (EBP) among clinical nurses.
Background: As EBP competencies comprise various domains, many EBP instruments have been developed. However, instruments available in Japanese for measuring EBP have not been reported systematically.
Design: We conducted a scoping review.
Data sources: Two different bibliography databases were searched to identify EBP instruments published until 2019: ICHUSHI (for Japanese articles) and PubMed.
Review methods: After relevant studies were screened and identified, study profile characteristics were extracted to identify EBP instruments in Japanese, and the quality of methodology for developing such instruments was evaluated. This information was recorded and the characteristics were descriptively summarized.
Results: Ninety potentially relevant articles were identified, of which seven articles and nine instruments were included in this review. All instruments were based on self-reported self-efficacy and attitudes. Few Japanese instruments included all the steps required for EBP. The overall reporting quality of each instrument was low.
Conclusions: EBP instruments available in Japanese are extremely scarce. The study results show that it is difficult to measure the various aspects of EBP with the existing instruments.
Keywords: Japan; cross-cultural comparison; evidence-based practice; nursing; psychometrics; scoping review.
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Albarqouni, L., Hoffmann, T., & Glasziou, P. (2018). Evidence-based practice educational intervention studies: A systematic review of what is taught and how it is measured. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 177. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1284-1
-
- Arskey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
-
- Endo, Y., Asanuma, Y., Yamanouchi, K., & Ito, O. (2009). Information seeking behaviour and perception of barriers to research utilization of nursing administrators in Japan. Journal of the Faculty of Nursing, Iwate Prefectural University, 11, 1-12.
-
- Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
-
- Huh, S. (2016). How to add a journal to the international databases, science citation index expanded and MEDLINE. Archives of Plastic Surgery, 43(6), 487-490. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2016.43.6.487
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
