Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct;66(4):495-502.
doi: 10.1002/mus.27691. Epub 2022 Aug 15.

Longitudinal comparison of the self-entry Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-RSE) and Rasch-Built Overall Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Disability Scale (ROADS) as outcome measures in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Affiliations

Longitudinal comparison of the self-entry Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-RSE) and Rasch-Built Overall Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Disability Scale (ROADS) as outcome measures in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Stephen A Johnson et al. Muscle Nerve. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Introduction/aims: Improved functional outcome measures in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) would aid ALS trial design and help hasten drug discovery. We evaluate the longitudinal performance of the Rasch-Built Overall Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Disability Scale (ROADS) compared to the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale Revised for Self-Entry (ALSFRS-RSE) as patient reported outcomes of functional status in people with ALS.

Methods: Participants completed the ROADS and the ALSFRS-RSE questionnaires at baseline, 3-, 6-, and 12- mo using Research Electronic Data Capture as part of a prospective, longitudinal, remote, online survey study of fatigue in ALS from 9/2020 to 12/2021. The scales were compared cross-sectionally (at baseline) and longitudinally. Correlation coefficients, coefficients of variation, and descriptive statistics were assessed.

Results: A total of 182 adults with ALS consented to the study. This volunteer sample was comprised of predominantly White, non-Hispanic, non-smoking participants. Consented participant survey completion was approximately 90% at baseline and greater than 40% at 12 mo. The ALSFRS-RSE and the ROADS had high, significant agreement at 3 and 6 mo by Cohen's kappa ≥71% (p < 0.001); the number of functional increases or plateaus on the two scales were not significantly different; and the coefficient of variation of functional decline was similar at the 6-month mark, though higher for the ROADS at 3 mo and lower at 12 mo.

Discussion: Although the ROADS performed similarly to the ALSFRS-RSE in an observational cohort, it has psychometric advantages, such as Rasch-modeling and unidimensionality. It merits further investigation as a patient reported outcome of overall disability and efficacy outcome measure in ALS trials.

Keywords: ALSFRS-R; ALSFRS-RSE; ROADS; amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; outcome measure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

SAJ has received research support from the ALS Association. JDB has received research support from Biogen, MT Pharma of America, MT Pharma Holdings of America, Transposon Therapeutics, Alexion, Rapa Therapeutics, ALS Association, Muscular Dystrophy Association, ALS One, Tambourine, ALS Finding a Cure. He has been a paid member of an advisory panel for Regeneron, Biogen, Clene Nanomedicine, MT Pharma of America, MT Pharma Holdings of America, Janssen, RRT. He received an honorarium for an educational event for Projects in Knowledge. He has unpaid roles on the advisory boards for the non‐profits Everything ALS and ALS One. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Cohen's kappa for decrease at 6 mo. This figure displays scale agreement between the Rasch‐Built Overall Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Disability Scale (ROADS) and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale‐Revised Self‐Entry (ALSFRS‐RSE) at 6 mo. Where the lines intersect in the center represents 0 change in score while moving up along the Y axis and to the right along the X‐axis both represent increasing scores and vice versa. Blue background represents congruent change while the red background represents the scale slopes not increasing or decreasing in harmony. Overall scale agreement was 74%

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cedarbaum JM, Stambler N, Malta E, et al. The ALSFRS‐R: a revised ALS functional rating scale that incorporates assessments of respiratory function. BDNF ALS study group (phase III). J Neurol Sci. 1999;169:13‐21. doi:10.1016/s0022-510x(99)00210-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kollewe K, Mauss U, Krampfl K, Petri S, Dengler R, Mohammadi B. ALSFRS‐R score and its ratio: a useful predictor for ALS‐progression. J Neurol Sci. 2008;275:69‐73. 10.1016/j.jns.2008.07.016 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Franchignoni F, Mora G, Giordano A, Volanti P, Chio A. Evidence of multidimensionality in the ALSFRS‐R scale: a critical appraisal on its measurement properties using Rasch analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013;84:1340‐1345. 10.1136/jnnp-2012-304701 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Franchignoni F, Mandrioli J, Giordano A, Ferro S, Group E. A further Rasch study confirms that ALSFRS‐R does not conform to fundamental measurement requirements. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2015;16:331‐337. 10.3109/21678421.2015.1026829 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beukenhorst AL, Howells K, Cook L, et al. Engagement and participant experiences with consumer smartwatches for health research: longitudinal, observational feasibility study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8:e14368. 10.2196/14368 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types