Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 2;11(15):e026375.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.026375. Epub 2022 Jul 29.

Identification of Distinct Subgroups in Moderately Severe Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis Using Data-Driven Phenotyping of Longitudinal Hemodynamic Progression

Affiliations

Identification of Distinct Subgroups in Moderately Severe Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis Using Data-Driven Phenotyping of Longitudinal Hemodynamic Progression

Kyu-Yong Ko et al. J Am Heart Assoc. .

Abstract

Background Rheumatic mitral stenosis is a significant cause of valvular heart disease. Pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (PASP) reflects the hemodynamic consequences of mitral stenosis and is used to determine treatment strategies. However, PASP progression and expected outcomes based on PASP changes in patients with moderately severe mitral stenosis remain unclear. Methods and Results A total of 436 patients with moderately severe rheumatic mitral stenosis (valve area 1.0-1.5 cm2) were enrolled. Composite outcomes included all-cause mortality and hospitalization for heart failure. Data-driven phenotyping identified 2 distinct trajectory groups based on PASP progression: rapid (8.7%) and slow (91.3%). Patients in the rapid progression group were older and had more diabetes and atrial fibrillation than those in the slow progression group (all P<0.05). The initial mean diastolic pressure gradient and PASP were higher in the rapid progression group than in the slow progression group (6.2±2.4 mm Hg versus 5.1±2.0 mm Hg [P=0.001] and 42.3±13.3 mm Hg versus 33.0±9.2 mm Hg [P<0.001], respectively). The rapid progression group had a poorer event-free survival rate than the slow progression group (log-rank P<0.001). Rapid PASP progression was a significant risk factor for composite outcomes even after adjusting for comorbidities (hazard ratio, 3.08 [95% CI, 1.68-5.64]; P<0.001). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that PASP >40 mm Hg was independently associated with allocation to the rapid progression group (odds ratio, 4.95 [95% CI, 2.08-11.99]; P<0.001). Conclusions Rapid PASP progression was associated with a higher risk of the composite outcomes. The main independent predictor for rapid progression group allocation was initial PASP >40 mm Hg.

Keywords: composite outcomes; data‐driven phenotyping; latent class trajectory modeling; pulmonary arterial systolic pressure; rheumatic mitral stenosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flowchart of patient selection for the final analysis.
MS indicates mitral stenosis; MVA, mitral valve area; and TTE, transthoracic echocardiography.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Trajectory profiles of PASP progression.
Based on predefined criteria, we identified the following 2 distinct trajectory subgroups: slow progression and rapid progression. PASP indicates pulmonary arterial systolic pressure.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier analysis for composite outcomes.
The Kaplan–Meier graph shows event‐free survival rates for the composite outcomes (all‐cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization). Rapid pulmonary arterial systolic pressure progression was associated with higher adverse outcome rates, including all‐cause death and hospitalization attributed to heart failure (log‐rank P<0.001).
Figure 4
Figure 4. Restricted cubic spline curve for the risk of rapid progression group allocation.
Based on the significant PASP value of 40 mm Hg in the receiver operating characteristic curve, the relationship between PASP progression and changes in PASP was calculated as a spline curve. PASP indicates pulmonary arterial systolic pressure.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Carapetis JR, Steera AC, Mulholland EK, Weber M. The global burden of group a streptococcal diseases. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5:685–694. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(05)70267-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Watkins DA, Johnson CO, Colquhoun SM, Karthikeyan G, Beaton A, Bukhman G, Forouzanfar MH, Longenecker CT, Mayosi BM, Mensah GA, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of rheumatic heart disease, 1990–2015. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:713–722. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1603693 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sanyal SK, Thapar MK, Ahmed SH, Hooja V, Tewari P. The initial attack of acute rheumatic fever during childhood in North India. Circulation. 1974;49:7–12. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.49.1.7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marcus RH, Sareli P, Pocock WA, Barlow JB. The spectrum of severe rheumatic mitral valve disease in a developing country: correlations among clinical presentation, surgical pathologic findings, and hemodynamic sequelae. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:177–183. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-120-3-199402010-00001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP III, Gentile F, Jneid H, Krieger EV, Mack M, McLeod C. 2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2021;143:e72–e227. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000923 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types