Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Nov;26(11):6795-6804.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04641-4. Epub 2022 Jul 29.

Effects of throat packs in upper airway surgery under intubation anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of throat packs in upper airway surgery under intubation anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial

Andreas Pabst et al. Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Introduction: Throat packs (TP) are used in upper airway surgery to avoid accumulation and aspiration of blood, foreign bodies, and fluids. But side effects such as sore throat and TP retention have been reported and challenge the standardized use of TP. The aim of this study is to compare benefits and side effects of TP versus no TP for upper airway procedures in intubation anesthesia.

Material and methods: One hundred forty-eight patients with surgical interventions at the upper airway under intubation anesthesia were included. Of those, n = 74 each were treated without (A, control) and with (B) TP. Study group B was subdivided whether TP was placed by the surgeon (B1; n = 37) or by the anesthesiologist (B2; n = 37). TP-related side effects such as sore throat, foreign body sensation, hoarseness, dyspnea, difficulty of swallowing, nausea, retching, nausea, aspiration, and pneumonia as well as the influence of TP design and the applicant (surgeon or anesthetist) were analyzed.

Results: A significantly increased rate of difficulty of swallowing (p = 0.045), intensity of sore throat (p = 0.04), and foreign body sensation (p = 0.024) was found in group B when compared to group A. There was no correlation between hoarseness, dyspnea, nausea, retching, and TP. No case of aspiration or pneumonia was seen but one TP was accidentally forgotten in the patient. B2 showed an increased frequency of difficulty swallowing, followed by A and B1. B1 led to the highest incidence of nausea followed by the A and B2.

Conclusion: The use of TP led to a high rate of side effects without showing the propagated advantages.

Clinical relevance: The use of TP must be considered critically and cannot generally be recommended without specific reasons, such as high aspiration risk.

Keywords: Foreign body sensation; Intubation anesthesia; Oral and maxillofacial surgery; Sore throat; Throat pack; Upper airway.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jin HJ, Kim S, Hwang SH (2019) Can pharyngeal packing prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting in nasal surgery? Laryngoscope 129(2):291–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.27189 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smith J, Reddy E (2017) Aspiration of Nasopore nasal packing. Case Reports BMJ Case Rep 2017:bcr2017221969. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2017-221969 - DOI
    1. Alfiky MG, Margalani OA, Rajeh AF, Alghamdi FE, Abu Suliman OA, Muathen SH, Elmorsy SA (2018) Nasopharyngeal versus hypopharyngeal packing during sino-nasal surgeries: randomised controlled trial. Randomized Controlled Trial Clin Otolaryngol 43(5):1235–1241. https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.13132 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stone JP, Collyer J (2003) Aide-memoir to pharyngeal pack removal. Anesth Analg 96(1):304. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-200301000-00067 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Scheck PA (1981) A pharyngeal pack fixed on to the tracheal tube. Anaesthesia 36(9):892–895. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1981.tb08865.x - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources