Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 1;48(1):1-7.
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004438. Epub 2022 Jul 29.

Detection of Critical Spinal Epidural Lesions on CT Using Machine Learning

Robert J Harris  1 , Scott G Baginski, Yulia Bronstein, Dietrich Schultze, Kenneth Segel, Shwan Kim, Jerry Lohr, Steve Towey, Nishit Shahi, Ian Driscoll, Brian Baker
Affiliations

Detection of Critical Spinal Epidural Lesions on CT Using Machine Learning

Robert J Harris et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). .

Abstract

Background: Critical spinal epidural pathologies can cause paralysis or death if untreated. Although magnetic resonance imaging is the preferred modality for visualizing these pathologies, computed tomography (CT) occurs far more commonly than magnetic resonance imaging in the clinical setting.

Objective: A machine learning model was developed to screen for critical epidural lesions on CT images at a large-scale teleradiology practice. This model has utility for both worklist prioritization of emergent studies and identifying missed findings.

Materials and methods: There were 153 studies with epidural lesions available for training. These lesions were segmented and used to train a machine learning model. A test data set was also created using previously missed epidural lesions. The trained model was then integrated into a teleradiology workflow for 90 days. Studies were sent to secondary manual review if the model detected an epidural lesion but none was mentioned in the clinical report.

Results: The model correctly identified 50.0% of epidural lesions in the test data set with 99.0% specificity. For prospective data, the model correctly prioritized 66.7% of the 18 epidural lesions diagnosed on the initial read with 98.9% specificity. There were 2.0 studies flagged for potential missed findings per day, and 17 missed epidural lesions were found during a 90-day time period. These results suggest almost half of critical spinal epidural lesions visible on CT imaging are being missed on initial diagnosis.

Conclusion: A machine learning model for identifying spinal epidural hematomas and abscesses on CT can be implemented in a clinical workflow.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Al-Mutair A, Bednar DA. Spinal epidural hematoma. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010;18:494–502.
    1. Schwab JH, Shah AA. Spinal epidural abscess: diagnosis, management, and outcomes. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020;28:929–38.
    1. Pierce JL, Donahue JH, Nacey NC, Quirk CR, Perry MT, Faulconer N, et al. Spinal hematomas: what a radiologist needs to know. Radiographics. 2018;38:1516–35.
    1. Ortiz AO, Levitt A, Shah LM, Parsons MS, Agarwal V, Baldwin K, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Suspected Spine Infection. J Am Coll Radiol. 2021;18:488–501.
    1. Harris RJ, Kim S, Lohr J, Towey S, Velichkovich Z, Kabachenko T, et al. Classification of aortic dissection and rupture on post-contrast CT images using a Convolutional Neural Network. J Digit Imaging. 2019;32:939–46.