Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct:60:40-44.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.06.012. Epub 2022 Jun 10.

Effects of COVID-19 lockdown strategies on emergency medical services

Burak Bekgöz  1 , Ebru Erek Kazan  2 , Ahmet Fatih Kahraman  3 , İshak Şan  4
Affiliations

Effects of COVID-19 lockdown strategies on emergency medical services

Burak Bekgöz et al. Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study is to evaluate the change in the number of EMS cases by comparing the lockdown period, the non-lockdown period, and the pre-pandemic period.

Methods: In our study, 3 periods of EMS cases were compared to evaluate the effect of lockdown. The first period (Period A) included in the study was the lockdown period (01-12-2020 and 31-01-2021. The second period (period B) is the period between 01 and 10-2020 and 30-11-2020, where there was no lockdown despite the pandemic. The third period (period C) in the study is the period between 01 and 12-2019 and 31-01-2020 before the pandemic.

Results: A total of 120,989 cases in 3 periods were included in the study. It was determined that the highest number of patients were in period C (42,703, 35.3%), while the least was in period A (39,054, 32.2%). On the other hand, it was found that the number of calls was highest in period A (246,200, 35.1%), while the least was in period C (212,267, 30.2%). Response times were longer in the pandemic period than in the pre-pandemic period. Mean talk time were longer during the pandemic period. The most frequent diagnosis in period A (21.6%) and B (42.2%) was COVID-19. The second most frequent disease group in these two periods was cardiovascular diseases.

Conclusion: While the number of EMS cases decreased during the pandemic period, it decreased even more during the lockdown period. However, the number of calls increased significantly during the lockdown period, and the response times and talk times increased accordingly.

Keywords: COVID-19; Emergency medical services; Pandemics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Response times and number of calls by hours.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) - Situation report – 1. 2020. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/2... [Accessed 13 September 2021]
    1. Backer J.A., Klinkenberg D., Wallinga J. Incubation period of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infections among travellers from Wuhan, China, 20–28 January 2020. Euro Surveill. 2020;25(5) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guan W.J., Ni Z.Y., Hu Y., Liang W.H., Ou C.Q., He J.X., et al. China medical treatment expert Group for Covid-19. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(18):1708–1720. - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. https://covid19.who.int/ [Accessed 13 September 2021]
    1. Munster V.J., Koopmans M., van Doremalen N., van Riel D., de Wit E. A novel coronavirus emerging in China - key questions for impact assessment. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(8):692–694. - PubMed