Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov;113(4):1164-1194.
doi: 10.1111/bjop.12585. Epub 2022 Jul 29.

Before/after Bayes: A comparison of frequentist and Bayesian mixed-effects models in applied psychological research

Ronald D Flores  1 , Christopher A Sanders  1 , Sean X Duan  1 , Brittney M Bishop-Chrzanowski  1 , Danielle L Oyler  1 , Hyejin Shim  1 , Hayley E Clocksin  1 , Alex P Miller  1 , Edgar C Merkle  1
Affiliations

Before/after Bayes: A comparison of frequentist and Bayesian mixed-effects models in applied psychological research

Ronald D Flores et al. Br J Psychol. 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Bayesian methods are becoming increasingly used in applied psychological research. Previous researchers have thoroughly written about much of the details already, including the philosophy underlying Bayesian methods, computational issues associated with Bayesian model estimation, Bayesian model development and summary, and the role of Bayesian methods in the so-called replication crisis. In this paper, we seek to provide case studies comparing the use of frequentist methods to the use of Bayesian methods in applied psychological research. These case studies are intended to 'illustrate by example' the ways that Bayesian modelling differs from frequentist modelling and the differing conclusions that one may arrive at using the two methods. The intended audience is applied psychological researchers who have been trained in the traditional frequentist framework, who are familiar with mixed-effects models and who are curious about how statistical results might look in a Bayesian context. Along with our case studies, we provide general opinions and guidance on the use of Bayesian methods in applied psychological research.

Keywords: Bayesian; frequentist; mixed-effects modelling; multilevel modelling.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255-278.
    1. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1-48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    1. Bishop-Chrzanowski, B. M., Scofield, J. E., Raith, K. M., & Johnson, J. D. (2021). [Emotion memory experiment 1]. [Unpublished raw data] Department of Psychological Sciences, University or Missouri, Columbia.
    1. Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1998). Bayesians and frequentists. British Medical Journal, 317, 1151-1160.
    1. Bowen, H. J., & Kensinger, E. A. (2017). Recapitulation of emotional source context during memory retrieval. Cortex, 91, 142-156.

LinkOut - more resources