Speciesism in everyday language
- PMID: 35906832
- PMCID: PMC10086848
- DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12561
Speciesism in everyday language
Abstract
Speciesism, like other forms of prejudice, is thought to be underpinned by biased patterns of language use. Thus far, however, psychological science has primarily focused on how speciesism is reflected in individuals' thoughts as opposed to wider collective systems of meaning such as language. We present a large-scale quantitative test of speciesism by applying machine-learning methods (word embeddings) to billions of English words derived from conversation, film, books, and the Internet. We found evidence of anthropocentric speciesism: words denoting concern (vs. indifference) and value (vs. valueless) were more closely associated with words denoting humans compared to many other animals. We also found evidence of companion animal speciesism: the same words were more closely associated with words denoting companion animals compared to most other animals. The work describes speciesism as a pervasive collective phenomenon that is evident in a naturally occurring expression of human psychology - everyday language.
Keywords: animals; human-animal relations; natural language processing; speciesism; word embeddings.
© 2022 The Authors. British Journal of Social Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Bastian, B. , & Crimston, D. (2016). The moral psychology of resource use. In Forgas J. P., Jussim L., & Van Lange P. A. M. (Eds.), The social psychology of morality (pp. 274–288). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
