Randomized Clinical Trial of Conventional versus Indoor Daylight Photodynamic Therapy for Treatment of Actinic Cheilitis
- PMID: 35907163
- PMCID: PMC9464288
- DOI: 10.1007/s13555-022-00783-1
Randomized Clinical Trial of Conventional versus Indoor Daylight Photodynamic Therapy for Treatment of Actinic Cheilitis
Abstract
Introduction: Actinic cheilitis (AC) is the biologic precursor of invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the vermilion, and different treatment options have been investigated, but their efficacy is hampered by local inflammation, pain and slow recovery. Daylight photodynamic therapy (dl-PDT) has been demonstrated to represent a valuable treatment option for AC, but its feasibility is limited by weather conditions and latitude.
Methods: Our study proposed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of conventional photodynamic therapy (c-PDT) and indoor daylight photodynamic therapy (idl-PDT) with a white LED lamp for the treatment of AC. Sixteen patients were enrolled in the study: 8 (50%) treated with c-PDT and 8 (50%) treated with idl-PDT. All patients completed the study protocol.
Results: Both idl-PDT and c-PDT were demonstrated to be highly effective in terms of reduction of the cumulative lesional area and severity of the clinical score. Neither treatment was inferior to the other. The inflammatory reaction and the pain scores were milder with idl-PDT, whereas the cosmetic outcome was not different.
Conclusion: The present findings confirm that idl-PDT can represent a valid therapeutic strategy for AC patients as well, despite the procedural difficulties and the risk of poor tolerability related to the body site.
Keywords: Actinic cheilitis; Conventional photodynamic therapy; Daylight photodynamic therapy; Indoor daylight photodynamic therapy; Photodynamic therapy.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Figures




Similar articles
-
Daylight photodynamic therapy for the treatment of actinic cheilitis.Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2019 Jan;35(1):11-16. doi: 10.1111/phpp.12415. Epub 2018 Aug 15. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2019. PMID: 30066408 Clinical Trial.
-
Daylight photodynamic therapy for the management of actinic cheilitis.Arch Dermatol Res. 2020 Dec;312(10):731-737. doi: 10.1007/s00403-020-02069-y. Epub 2020 Apr 7. Arch Dermatol Res. 2020. PMID: 32266532 Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical utility of daylight photodynamic therapy in the treatment of actinic keratosis - a review of the literature.Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2019 Jun 7;12:427-435. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S167498. eCollection 2019. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2019. PMID: 31239746 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A randomized split-face clinical trial of conventional vs indoor-daylight photodynamic therapy for the treatment of multiple actinic keratosis of the face and scalp and photoaging.J Dermatolog Treat. 2022 Jun;33(4):2250-2256. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2021.1944594. Epub 2021 Jun 28. J Dermatolog Treat. 2022. PMID: 34152936 Clinical Trial.
-
Daylight Photodynamic Therapy for Actinic Keratoses.Am J Clin Dermatol. 2018 Oct;19(5):647-656. doi: 10.1007/s40257-018-0360-y. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2018. PMID: 29752702 Review.
Cited by
-
Improved Simulated-Daylight Photodynamic Therapy and Possible Mechanism of Ag-Modified TiO2 on Melanoma.Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Apr 11;24(8):7061. doi: 10.3390/ijms24087061. Int J Mol Sci. 2023. PMID: 37108223 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Jadotte YT, Schwartz RA. Solar cheilosis: an ominous precursor: part I. Diagnostic insights. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;66(2):173–84. quiz 185–6. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials